Cited by 6Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeStatistical Methods in Clinical TrialsEconomic and Environmental Valuation

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Design & Analysis of Clinical Trials for Economic Evaluation & Reimbursement: An Applied Approach Using SAS & STATA

Khan, Iftekhar·2015·Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks

Abstract

Economic evaluation has become an essential component of clinical trial design to show that new treatments and technologies offer value to payers in various healthcare systems. Although many books exist that address the theoretical or practical aspects of cost-effectiveness analysis, this book differentiates itself from the competition by detailing

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1201/b19001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 6

Metadata

Authors
Khan, I.
Corresponding author
Khan, Iftekhar
Venue
Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks
Published
2015-11-11
OpenAlex
W4248527910
Cited by
6
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2015: 1
Type
reference entry
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
Keywords
clinical trial design, economic evaluation, cost-effectiveness analysis, reimbursement, treatment value, health technology assessment, health economics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review