Cited by 10Public Administration and GovernanceHistorical and Political StudiesPublic Policy and Administration Research

Bureaucracy, Administration, and Politics: An Introduction

Ali Farazmand·2009·Bureaucracy and Administration

Abstract

CONTENTS 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Bureaucracy and History: Civilization and Administration ...................................... 2 1.3 Th eoretical Framework ............................................................................................. 4 1.3.1 Meanings of Bureaucracy .............................................................................. 5 1.3.2 Th eoretical Perspectives ................................................................................. 5 1.3.3 Bureaucratic Evil ........................................................................................... 6 1.4 Bureaucratic Politics and Democratic Th eory ........................................................... 7 1.5 Bureaucracy and Development ................................................................................10 1.6 Bureaucracy, Change, and Revolution .................................................................... 12 1.7 Conclusion: Bureaucracy Persists, Beyond Weber ....................................................13 References .........................................................................................................................14 1.1 Introduction Bureaucracy is one of the oldest institutions of government and administration in history. As such, bureaucracy and administration are as old as human civilization, one promoting the other, hence…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1201/noe0824723699-6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • High-stakes public-sector decisions require a distinct algorithmic framework that accounts for bureaucratic processes and human discretion.

    “we argue that the high-stakes decisions being made within the public sector necessitate the critical need for a distinctly unique framework for algorithmic systems that accounts for the complexities of public sector bureaucratic processes [43,46,77] and the delicate application of human discretion that has historically been a cornerstone of social services [74,116].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 3 · Cited by 10

Authors
Farazmand, A.
Corresponding author
Ali Farazmand
Venue
Bureaucracy and Administration
Publisher
CRC Press
Published
2009-06-23
Pages
23-40
OpenAlex
W2492852908
Cited by
10
References
3
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
2.18
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
CRC Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Public Administration and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Historical and Political Studies
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
Keywords
bureaucracy, public administration, bureaucracy and politics, democratic theory, Max Weber, history of bureaucracy, ancient empires

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review