The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Buying, Searching, or Browsing: Differentiating Between Online Shoppers Using In-Store Navigational Clickstream
Abstract
In the bricks-and-mortar environment, stores employ sales people that have learned to distinguish between shoppers based on their in-store behavior. Some shoppers appear to be very focused in looking for a specific product. In those cases, sales people may step in and help the shopper find what they are looking for. In other cases, the shopper is merely “window shopping.” The experienced sales person can identify these shoppers and either ignore them and let them continue window shopping, or intercede and try and stimulate a purchase in the appropriate manner. However, in the virtual shopping environment, there is no sales person to perform that role. Therefore, this article theoretically develops and empirically tests a typology of store visits in which visits vary according to the shoppers’ underlying objectives. By using page-to-page clickstream data from a given online store, visits are categorized as a buying, browsing, searching, or knowledge-building visit based on observed in-store navigational patterns, including the general content of the pages viewed. Each type of visit varies in terms of purchasing likelihood. The shoppers, in each case, are also driven by different motivations and therefore would respond differentially to various marketing messages. The ability to categorize visits in such a manner allows the e-commerce marketer to identify likely buyers and design more effective, customized promotional message.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Work and/or Fun: Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value
Babin, B. J., Darden, W. R., & Griffin, M. (1994) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209376 · Cited by 6,020
Forecasting Repeat Sales at CDNOW: A Case Study
Fader, P. S., & Hardie, B. G. S. (2001) · Interfaces · doi:10.1287/inte.31.3s.94.9683 · Cited by 25
Cited by
Digital marketing: a framework, review, and research agenda
Kannan, P. K., & Li, H. “. (2017) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2016.11.006 · Cited by 1,707
Marketing Analytics for Data-Rich Environments
Wedel, M., & Kannan, P. K. (2016) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jm.15.0413 · Cited by 1,261
Schlosser, A. E., White, T. B., & Lloyd, S. M. (2006) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.70.2.133 · Cited by 947
Brynjolfsson, E., Hu, Y. (., & Simester, D. (2011) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1110.1371 · Cited by 847
Huang, P., Lurie, N. H., & Mitra, S. (2009) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.73.2.55 · Cited by 760
Metadata
- Authors
- Moe, W. W.
- Venue
- Journal of Consumer Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-03-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 29-39
- ISSN
- 1057-7408 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7663
- OpenAlex
- W1994099982
- Cited by
- 741
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 69.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Buying, Searching, or Browsing: Differentiating Between Online Shoppers Using In-Store Navigational Clickstream. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1207/153276603768344762
- The paper
- Moe, W. W. (2003). Buying, Searching, or Browsing: Differentiating Between Online Shoppers Using In-Store Navigational Clickstream. Journal of Consumer Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1207/153276603768344762
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.