Capturing momentary, self-report data: A proposal for reporting guidelines
Abstract
Self-report data are ubiquitous in behavioral and medical research. Retrospective assessment strategies are prone to recall bias and distortion. New techniques for assessing immediate experiences in respondents' natural environments (e.g., Ecological Momentary Assessment, Experience Sampling) are being used by many researchers to reduce reporting bias. This article discusses seven aspects of momentary research that are often overlooked or minimized in the presentation of momentary research reports, yet that are critical to the success of the research: (a) the rationale for the momentary sampling design, (b) the details of momentary sampling procedures, (c) the data acquisition interface, (d) rates of compliance with the sampling plan, (e) the procedures used to train and monitor participants, (f) data management procedures, and (g) the data analytic approach. Attention to these areas in both the design and reporting of momentary research studies will not only improve momentary research protocols but also allow for the successful replication of research findings by other investigators.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Ecological Momentary Assessments collected by using handheld personal data assistants help enhance compliance and provide precise information on time and date of diary entries.
“This methodology helps enhance compliance and provides precise information on time and date of diary entries.8,113,115”
From Psychological aspects of persistent pain: Current state of the science (2004) · cites this paper as [115]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 26 · Cited by 807
- Authors
- Stone, A. A., & Shiffman, S.
- Affiliations
- State University of New York (US)
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Corresponding author
- Stone, Arthur A.
- Venue
- Annals of Behavioral Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-08
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 236-243
- ISSN
- 0742-5554 (ISSN-L)
- 0883-6612
- 1532-4796
- OpenAlex
- W2059353180
- Cited by
- 807
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 60 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 33
- FWCI
- 19.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annals of Behavioral Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing
- Keywords
- ecological momentary assessment, reporting guidelines, data acquisition interface, data management, replication, recall bias, self-reported data
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Research, Self-Assessment, Guidelines as Topic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review