Cited by 807Mental Health Research TopicsInnovative Human-Technology InteractionMobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing

Capturing momentary, self-report data: A proposal for reporting guidelines

Stone, Arthur A., Shiffman, Saul·2002·Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

Self-report data are ubiquitous in behavioral and medical research. Retrospective assessment strategies are prone to recall bias and distortion. New techniques for assessing immediate experiences in respondents' natural environments (e.g., Ecological Momentary Assessment, Experience Sampling) are being used by many researchers to reduce reporting bias. This article discusses seven aspects of momentary research that are often overlooked or minimized in the presentation of momentary research reports, yet that are critical to the success of the research: (a) the rationale for the momentary sampling design, (b) the details of momentary sampling procedures, (c) the data acquisition interface, (d) rates of compliance with the sampling plan, (e) the procedures used to train and monitor participants, (f) data management procedures, and (g) the data analytic approach. Attention to these areas in both the design and reporting of momentary research studies will not only improve momentary research protocols but also allow for the successful replication of research findings by other investigators.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15324796abm2403_09

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ecological Momentary Assessments collected by using handheld personal data assistants help enhance compliance and provide precise information on time and date of diary entries.

    “This methodology helps enhance compliance and provides precise information on time and date of diary entries.8,113,115”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 26 · Cited by 807

Authors
Stone, A. A., & Shiffman, S.
Affiliations
  • State University of New York (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Stone, Arthur A.
Venue
Annals of Behavioral Medicine
Published
2002-08
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
236-243
ISSN
  • 0742-5554 (ISSN-L)
  • 0883-6612
  • 1532-4796
OpenAlex
W2059353180
Cited by
807
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 60 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 33
FWCI
19.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Behavioral Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing
Keywords
ecological momentary assessment, reporting guidelines, data acquisition interface, data management, replication, recall bias, self-reported data
MeSH terms
Humans, Research, Self-Assessment, Guidelines as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review