The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Diabetes self-management among low-income spanish-speaking patients: A pilot study
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of type 2 diabetes and diabetes-related morbidity and mortality is higher among low-income Hispanics when compared to that of Whites. However, little is known about how to effectively promote self-management in this population. PURPOSE: The objectives were first to determine the feasibility of conducting a randomized clinical trial of an innovative self-management intervention to improve metabolic control in low-income Spanish-speaking individuals with type 2 diabetes and second to obtain preliminary data of possible intervention effects. METHODS: Participants for this pilot study were recruited from a community health center, an elder program, and a community-wide database developed by the community health center, in collaboration with other agencies serving the community, by surveying households in the entire community. Participants were randomly assigned to an intervention (n = 15) or a control (n = 10) condition. Assessments were conducted at baseline and at 3 months and 6 months postrandomization. The intervention consisted of 10 group sessions that targeted diabetes knowledge, attitudes, and self-management skills through culturally specific and literacy-sensitive strategies. The intervention used a cognitive-behavioral theoretical framework. RESULTS: Recruitment rates at the community health center, elder program, and community registry were 48%, 69%, and 8%, respectively. Completion rates for baseline, 3-month, and 6-month assessments were 100%, 92%, and 92%, respectively. Each intervention participant attended an average of 7.8 out of 10 sessions, and as a group the participants showed high adherence to intervention activities (93% turned in daily logs, and 80% self-monitored glucose levels at least daily). There was an overall Group x Time interaction (p = .02) indicating group differences in glycosylated hemoglobin over time. The estimated glycosylated hemoglobin decrease at 3 months for the intervention group was -0.8% (95% confidence intervals = -1.1%, -0.5%) compared with the change in the control group (p = .02). At 6 months, the decrease in the intervention group remained significant, -0.85% (95% confidence intervals = -1.2, -0.5), and the decrease was still significantly different from that of the controls (p = .005). There was a trend toward increased physical activity in the intervention group as compared to that of the control group (p = .11) and some evidence (nonsignificant) of an increase in blood glucose self-monitoring in the intervention participants but not the control participants. Adjusting for baseline depressive scores, we observed a significant difference in depressive symptoms between intervention participants and control participants at the 3-month assessment (p = .02). CONCLUSIONS: Low-income Spanish-speaking Hispanics are receptive to participate in diabetes-related research. This study shows that the pilot-tested diabetes self-management program is promising and warrants the conduct of a randomized clinical trial.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Six of the 25 trials listed in Table 3 described provision of feedback as part of the intervention. Five of these studies resulted in positive lifestyle changes.44,46,52,55,81”
In the citing paper
“Among the 25 trials with sizable minority representation in Table 3, only 6 included interventions that described self-monitoring.42,46,50–52,59”
In the citing paper
“Five of these 6 trials that included self-monitoring42,46,50–52 led to positive lifestyle behavior changes, compared with 13 of the 19 trials that did not include self-monitoring.”
In the citing paper
“The trials using both professionals and lay leaders also further led to positive outcomes in diet,55,76 blood cholesterol and BP,53,55 PA,53 and hemoglobin A1c at follow-up.52”
In the citing paper
“Among the 16 multicomponent intervention trials involving minority populations (Table 3), most 47–53,55,74–76,81,102,112 demonstrated some positive changes in either dietary and/or PA behavior.”
In the citing paper
“Of the 25 trials reviewed (Table 3), 18 designed culturally sensitive interventions and had mixed results.43–47,52,55,59,74–76,81,93,96,102,103,110,144”
In the citing paper
“Of the 25 trials reviewed (Table 3), 3 tested lay-led group or individual-level interventions,43,48,74 and 4 tested interventions that combined professional and lay educators.52,53,55,76”
In the citing paper
“Seven of the 25 studies described in Table 3 used interventions sensitive to literacy levels44,45,47,52,54,74,81; 6 of these44,45,47,52,74,81 resulted in some positive outcomes.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The CES-D Scale: A Self-Report Depression Scale for Research in the General Population
Radloff, L. S. (1977) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/014662167700100306 · Cited by 53,267
Self-efficacy: The exercise of control
Bandura, A., Freeman, W. H., & Lightsey, R. (1999) · Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1891/0889-8391.13.2.158 · Cited by 46,835
Self-efficacy: the exercise of control
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.35-1826 · Cited by 24,451
Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis
Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310 · Cited by 18,093
Littell, R. C. (1996) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 10,345
Yu, S. M. (1998) · Maternal and Child Health Journal · doi:10.1023/a:1021801927353 · Cited by 3,876
Healthy People 2010: Understanding and Improving Health
UNSPECIFIED (2000) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e319432004-001 · Cited by 2,170
Effectiveness of Self-Management Training in Type 2 Diabetes
Norris, S. L., Engelgau, M. M., & Venkat Narayan, K. M. (2001) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.24.3.561 · Cited by 1,846
Self-Management Education for Adults With Type 2 Diabetes
Norris, S. L., Lau, J., Smith, S. J., Schmid, C. H., & Engelgau, M. M. (2002) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.25.7.1159 · Cited by 1,750
Nclr (2003) · Encyclopedia of the U.S. Census · doi:10.4135/9781452225272.n83 · Cited by 1,294
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- 2003, Demographic Report for 2003: Door to Door Outreach Utilizing Community HealthWorkers.
- Rosal, 2004, Perceptions and preferences of low-literate Hispanics for diabetes education, HealthEducationandBehavior., 31, 388
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Artinian, N. T., Fletcher, G. F., Mozaffarian, D., Kris-Etherton, P., Van Horn, L., Lichtenstein, A. H., Kumanyika, S., Kraus, W. E., Fleg, J. L., Redeker, N. S., et al. (2010) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0b013e3181e8edf1 · Cited by 919
Chrvala, C. A., Sherr, D., & Lipman, R. D. (2016) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2015.11.003 · Cited by 914
Zeltzer, L. K., Recklitis, C., Buchbinder, D., Zebrack, B., Casillas, J., Tsao, J. C. I., Lu, Q., & Krull, K. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2008.21.1433 · Cited by 660
Steinsbekk, A., Rygg, L., Lisulo, M., Rise, M. B., & Fretheim, A. (2012) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-12-213 · Cited by 660
Does monitoring goal progress promote goal attainment? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence.
Harkin, B., Webb, T. L., Chang, B. P. I., Prestwich, A., Conner, M., Kellar, I., Benn, Y., & Sheeran, P. (2016) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000025 · Cited by 564
Metadata
- Authors
- Rosal, M. C., Olendzki, B., Reed, G. W., Gumieniak, O., Scavron, J., & Ockene, I.
- Affiliations
- University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Brightwood Health Center, Springfield, Massachusetts
- Corresponding author
- Rosal, Milagros C.
- Venue
- Annals of Behavioral Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-06-01
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 225-235
- ISSN
- 0742-5554 (ISSN-L)
- 0883-6612
- 1532-4796
- OpenAlex
- W2056494570
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 4.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annals of Behavioral Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship@UMassChan (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Keywords
- type 2 diabetes, diabetes self-management, Spanish-speaking patients, culturally tailored interventions, cognitive-behavioral intervention, HbA1c, glycemic control, self-monitoring of blood glucose, physical activity, intervention feasibility, community health centers, health disparities, older adults
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Attitude to Health, Cultural Characteristics, Depression, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Education as Topic, Self Care, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring, Health Behavior, Treatment Outcome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review