Frequency of attendance at religious services and leisure-time physical activity in american women and men: The third national health and nutrition examination survey
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Studies are lacking from representative samples of total populations and Hispanic Americans on the association of religiousness and leisure time physical activity (LTPA). PURPOSE: The objective is to test the hypothesis that frequency of attendance at religious services is positively associated with LTPA. METHODS: The Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) included 11,820 persons 20 years of age and older with complete data on self-reported frequency of attendance at religious services, LTPA, and mobility limitation. RESULTS: Among older women with no mobility limitation, infrequent attenders had significantly higher prevalence of no LTPA (odds ratio = 1.4; 95% confidence interval = 1.1, 1.9; p = .02), but infrequent attenders were not significantly different from others in prevalence of moderate or vigorous LTPA 5 or more times per week after adjustment for sociodemographic variables and health status. No significant associations were seen at 20 to 59 years of age or in men. CONCLUSIONS: In older women without mobility limitation, less than weekly attendance at religious services was associated with greater prevalence of no LTPA even after controlling for health status. Significant adjusted associations were not seen in men or younger women.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Of the 83 methodologically most rigorous smoking studies, 75 (90%) reported inverse relationships with R/S involvement.
“Of the 83 methodologically most rigorous studies, 75 (90%) reported inverse relationships with R/S involvement [213, 285–294].”
From Religion, Spirituality, and Health: The Research and Clinical Implications (2012) · cites this paper as [291]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 45 · Cited by 76
- Authors
- Gillum, R. F.
- Affiliations
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gillum, R. Frank
- ORCID
- Gillum, R. Frank
- Venue
- Annals of Behavioral Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-02
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 30-35
- ISSN
- 0742-5554 (ISSN-L)
- 0883-6612
- 1532-4796
- OpenAlex
- W2137494623
- Cited by
- 76
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 0.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annals of Behavioral Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
- Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
- Keywords
- religious service attendance, leisure-time physical activity, religiosity, older women, mobility limitations, Hispanic Americans, NHANES III, physical inactivity, sex differences
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Health Status, Humans, Leisure Activities, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Activity, Periodicity, Surveys and Questionnaires, Religion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review