Cited by 76Physical Activity and HealthReligion, Spirituality, and PsychologyReligion and Society Interactions

Frequency of attendance at religious services and leisure-time physical activity in american women and men: The third national health and nutrition examination survey

Gillum, R. Frank·2006·Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies are lacking from representative samples of total populations and Hispanic Americans on the association of religiousness and leisure time physical activity (LTPA). PURPOSE: The objective is to test the hypothesis that frequency of attendance at religious services is positively associated with LTPA. METHODS: The Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) included 11,820 persons 20 years of age and older with complete data on self-reported frequency of attendance at religious services, LTPA, and mobility limitation. RESULTS: Among older women with no mobility limitation, infrequent attenders had significantly higher prevalence of no LTPA (odds ratio = 1.4; 95% confidence interval = 1.1, 1.9; p = .02), but infrequent attenders were not significantly different from others in prevalence of moderate or vigorous LTPA 5 or more times per week after adjustment for sociodemographic variables and health status. No significant associations were seen at 20 to 59 years of age or in men. CONCLUSIONS: In older women without mobility limitation, less than weekly attendance at religious services was associated with greater prevalence of no LTPA even after controlling for health status. Significant adjusted associations were not seen in men or younger women.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15324796abm3101_6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Of the 83 methodologically most rigorous smoking studies, 75 (90%) reported inverse relationships with R/S involvement.

    “Of the 83 methodologically most rigorous studies, 75 (90%) reported inverse relationships with R/S involvement [213, 285–294].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 45 · Cited by 76

Authors
Gillum, R. F.
Affiliations
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Corresponding author
Gillum, R. Frank
Venue
Annals of Behavioral Medicine
Published
2006-02
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
30-35
ISSN
  • 0742-5554 (ISSN-L)
  • 0883-6612
  • 1532-4796
OpenAlex
W2137494623
Cited by
76
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Behavioral Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
Keywords
religious service attendance, leisure-time physical activity, religiosity, older women, mobility limitations, Hispanic Americans, NHANES III, physical inactivity, sex differences
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Health Status, Humans, Leisure Activities, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Activity, Periodicity, Surveys and Questionnaires, Religion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review