The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Improving the Prediction of College Performance of Ethnic Minorities Using the IRT-Based GPA
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some of these additional determinants may lie at the college level, such as systematic differences in course difficulty.
“Some of these may lie at the college level, such as systematic differences in course difficulty (Young, 1991).”
From An Omitted Variables Approach to Disentangling Differential Prediction in College Admissions (2026) · cites this paper as Young, 1991
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
An Omitted Variables Approach to Disentangling Differential Prediction in College Admissions
Demeke, S., Sackett, P. R., Kuncel, N. R., & Lee, S. D. (2026) · Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice · doi:10.1111/emip.70048
Metadata
- Authors
- Young, J. W.
- Corresponding author
- Young, John W.
- Venue
- Applied Measurement in Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1991-07
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 229-239
- ISSN
- 0895-7347 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-4818
- OpenAlex
- W2012089637
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Applied Measurement in Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Outcomes and Influences
- Keywords
- ethnic minorities, grade point average, item response theory, student performance prediction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
