Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 210

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Linking Results of Distinct Assessments

Lim, Robert L.·1993·Applied Measurement in Education

Abstract

With increased demands for various types of assessments-from the class- room use of individual student results to international comparisons-has come an expanded desire to use assessments for multiple purposes by linking results from distinct assessments. There is a desire to make comparisons from results on one assessment with those of another (e.g., the results from a state assessment vs. the results on a national or international assessment). The degree to which desired interpretations and inferences are justified, however, depends on the nature of the assessments being compared and the ways in which the linkage occurs. Five different types of linking (equating, calibra- tion, statistical moderation, prediction, and social moderation) are distin- guished. The characteristics of these types of linking, their requirements for the assessments being linked, and the comparative inferences they support are described.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15324818ame0601_5

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 210

Metadata

Authors
Lim, R. L.
Venue
Applied Measurement in Education
Published
1993-01
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
83-102
ISSN
  • 0895-7347 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-4818
OpenAlex
W2088859820
Cited by
210
References
0
FWCI
7.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Linking Results of Distinct Assessments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1207/s15324818ame0601_5
The paper
Lim, R. L. (1993). Linking Results of Distinct Assessments. Applied Measurement in Education. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324818ame0601_5

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.