Cited by 55Cognitive Functions and MemoryNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesAging and Gerontology Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Attention and vigilance functions in normal aging

Filley, C. M., Cullum, C. M.·1994·Applied Neuropsychology

Abstract

Clinical observation and considerable research have documented that a slowing of cognitive processing occurs in many healthy older persons. The neuropsychological characterization of this slowing, however, remains unclear, as does its neuroanatomic basis. In a preliminary attempt to help clarify this issue, we conducted two studies with healthy older individuals to evaluate whether declines in immediate and/or sustained attention appear with advancing age. In Study I, 166 subjects aged 50-69 and 70-90 were given several standard tests of immediate attention. No major differences in simple attentional function emerged. In Study II, 38 subjects in the same age ranges were administered tests of sustained attention. Significant differences between groups were seen on a digit cancellation task, despite similar performances on other measures requiring visual scanning and psychomotor speeded responses. The results of the two studies suggest that whereas simple attention tends to remain stable with aging, sustained attention appears to decline after the age of 70. This factor likely contributes to the general slowing of cognition often reported in the elderly, and may be associated with specific age-related neuroanatomic changes.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15324826an0101&2_6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 14 · Cited by 55

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Boone KB, Neurology, 49, 549
  2. Drachman DA, Psychology, 93, 302
  3. Filley CM, Neurology, 46, 157
  4. Heaton RK, Thompson LL, Nelson LM, Filley CM & Franklin GM (1990) Brief and mtermediate-length screening of neurops~chological impairment in multlple sclerosis In Rao SM (ed ), Neurobehaz~zoral Aspects of Multrple Sclerosis (pp 1.29-160) New York Oxford University Press
  5. Hochanadel G & Kaplan E (1984) Neurops~chology of normal aglng In Albert ML (ed), Clrrilcal Neurology of Agltig (pp 231-244) New York Oxford Universitv Press
  6. Posner MI, Neuroscience, 13, 25
  7. Ylikoski R, Neurology, 50, 818

Metadata

Authors
Filley, C. M., & Cullum, C. M.
Affiliations
University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
Venue
Applied Neuropsychology
Published
1994-11-01
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
29-32
ISSN
0908-4282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2034400890
Cited by
55
References
14
Citations by year
2025: 9 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Applied Neuropsychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
normal aging, attention, sustained attention, cognitive slowing, visual exploration, psychomotor speed, older adults

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review