Attention and vigilance functions in normal aging
Abstract
Clinical observation and considerable research have documented that a slowing of cognitive processing occurs in many healthy older persons. The neuropsychological characterization of this slowing, however, remains unclear, as does its neuroanatomic basis. In a preliminary attempt to help clarify this issue, we conducted two studies with healthy older individuals to evaluate whether declines in immediate and/or sustained attention appear with advancing age. In Study I, 166 subjects aged 50-69 and 70-90 were given several standard tests of immediate attention. No major differences in simple attentional function emerged. In Study II, 38 subjects in the same age ranges were administered tests of sustained attention. Significant differences between groups were seen on a digit cancellation task, despite similar performances on other measures requiring visual scanning and psychomotor speeded responses. The results of the two studies suggest that whereas simple attention tends to remain stable with aging, sustained attention appears to decline after the age of 70. This factor likely contributes to the general slowing of cognition often reported in the elderly, and may be associated with specific age-related neuroanatomic changes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Several previous studies found linear age-related FCS decreases in medial prefrontal cortex, precuneus, insula, and calcarine and linear FCS increases in sensorimotor areas based on general linear model.
“Similar to our findings, several previous studies found linear-age-related FCS decreases in the medial prefrontal cortex, precuneus, insula, and calcarine and linear FCS increases in sensorimotor areas based on the general linear model [36-38].”
From Mapping neurophysiological subtypes of major depressive disorder using normative models of the functional connectome (2023) · cites this paper as [36]
Sensorimotor areas are the least affected by aging.
“Conversely, the sensorimotor areas are the least affected by aging [36].”
From Mapping neurophysiological subtypes of major depressive disorder using normative models of the functional connectome (2023) · cites this paper as [36]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 14 · Cited by 55
- Authors
- Filley, C. M., & Cullum, C. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
- Venue
- Applied Neuropsychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1994-11-01
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 29-32
- ISSN
- 0908-4282 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2034400890
- Cited by
- 55
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2025: 9 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Applied Neuropsychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
- Keywords
- normal aging, attention, sustained attention, cognitive slowing, visual exploration, psychomotor speed, older adults
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review