Cited by 282Policing Practices and PerceptionsCriminal Justice and PenologySocial and Intergroup Psychology

Distributional and Procedural Aspects of Satisfaction With Citizen-Police Encounters

Tyler, Tom R., Folger, Robert·1980·Basic and Applied Social Psychology

Abstract

Using data from a survey of a sample of the residents of Evanston, Illinois, the hypothesis of Thibaut and Walker—that the procedures utilized to resolve a dispute have an impact upon satisfaction that is independent of outcomes received—is tested in the context of police-citizen encounters, It is found that when citizens call the police for assistance or are stopped by the police, their perception of the fairness of their treatment by the police has an impact upon their satisfaction with the police that is independent of whether the police: (1) solve the problem about which the citizen calls; or (2) cite the citizen they have stopped for a violation of the law. These findings suggest that issues of procedural justice have a much broader range of applicability than to the courtroom settings within which they have previously been studied.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15324834basp0104_1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The policing literature contains ample evidence attesting to the importance of procedural justice in police-citizen encounters, even when such interactions result in arrest.

    “The policing literature contains ample evidence attesting to the importance of procedural justice in police-citizen encounters (e.g., Tyler, 1990;Tyler & Folger, 1980), even when such interactions result in arrest (Bouffard & Piquero, in press;Paternoster, Brame, Bachman, & Sherman, 1997; see also Sherman, 1993).”
  • Even citizens who have involuntary police contacts express greater satisfaction afterward if they believe the officer treated them fairly.

    “Even citizens who have involuntary police contacts express greater satisfaction afterward if they believe the officer treated them fairly (Tyler & Folger, 1980).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 10 · Cited by 282

Authors
Tyler, T. R., & Folger, R.
Affiliations
Northwestern University (US)
Venue
Basic and Applied Social Psychology
Published
1980-12
Volume
1
Issue
4
Pages
281-292
ISSN
  • 0197-3533 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-4834
OpenAlex
W2079504183
Cited by
282
References
10
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 12
FWCI
20.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Basic and Applied Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
procedural justice, distributive justice, citizen satisfaction with police, police-citizen encounters, perceived fairness, police stops, dispute settlement procedure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review