The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prescribing Effective Human Problem-Solving Processes: Problem Description in Physics
Abstract
We formulate a theoretical model specifying the underlying knowledge and procedures whereby human problem solvers can generate useful initial descriptions of scientific problems. This model is prescriptive, that is, it does not necessarily try to simulate the behavior of actual experts nor assume that their performance is optimal. To test such a model, formulated for the domain of mechanics, we devised a carefully controlled experiment where human subjects were induced to act in accordance with specified alternative models and where their resulting performance was observed in detail. The results show that the proposed model is sufficient to generate excellent problem descriptions, that these markedly improve subsequent problem solutions, and that major components of the model are necessary for good performance. Furthermore, detailed analysis of the data shows how the model predictably prevents the occurrence of many common errors. Such a validated prescriptive model provides a useful basis for teaching students improved problem-solving skills.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
VanLEHN, K. (2011) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2011.611369 · Cited by 2,323
Singer, S., & Smith, K. A. (2013) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/jee.20030 · Cited by 835
Synthesis of discipline-based education research in physics
Docktor, J. L., & Mestre, J. P. (2014) · Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research · doi:10.1103/physrevstper.10.020119 · Cited by 549
Teaching and physics education research: bridging the gap
Fraser, J. M., Timan, A. L., Miller, K., Dowd, J. E., Tucker, L., & Mazur, E. (2014) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/77/3/032401 · Cited by 422
When Are Tutorial Dialogues More Effective Than Reading?
VanLehn, K., Graesser, A. C., Jackson, G. T., Jordan, P., Olney, A., & Rosé, C. P. (2007) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1080/03640210709336984 · Cited by 378
Metadata
- Authors
- Heller, J. I., & Reif, F.
- Venue
- Cognition and Instruction
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1984-03
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 177-216
- ISSN
- 0737-0008 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-690X
- OpenAlex
- W2064217343
- Cited by
- 246
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 58.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prescribing Effective Human Problem-Solving Processes: Problem Description in Physics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1207/s1532690xci0102_2
- The paper
- Heller, J. I., & Reif, F. (1984). Prescribing Effective Human Problem-Solving Processes: Problem Description in Physics. Cognition and Instruction. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0102_2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.