Cited by 168Literacy, Media, and EducationInnovative Education and Learning PracticesLinguistics and Education Research

Literacy Networks: Following the Circulation of Texts, Bodies, and Objects in the Schooling and Online Gaming of One Youth

Leander, Kevin M., Lovvorn, Jason F.·2006·Cognition and Instruction

Abstract

In this article, we offer an approach to conceiving of the relation between literacy practices and space–time. Literacy, embedded in other forms of activity, has a unique role in producing and organizing space–time relations, and such relations provide for different forms of cognition and learning. Closely examining how literacy practices produce and organize space–time helps researchers move beyond folk distinctions based on setting or context, such as "in school," versus "out of school," which necessarily associate different settings with different practices. Drawing on actor network theory, we propose a new way of reconceiving of literacy and its relations to space–time through the construct of the literacy network. We define and develop 5 space–time dimensions of literacy networks, including translation, the heterogeneity of space–time representations, movements and positions of texts in circulation, rhythms and speeds of circulation, and network continuity. Drawing on these dimensions, we analyze 3 different literacy networks that 1 youth, Brian, participates in, including 2 from school classrooms and 1 from his play of a massively multiplayer online game. We argue that the space–time dimensions of these networks have direct relevance to understanding Brian's engagement, agency, and identity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s1532690xci2403_1

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Students engage in literacy practices and learning outside of school, learning they consider powerful and important.

    “Students also engage in literacy practices and learning outside of school, learning they consider powerful and important.”
  • Typical approaches to secondary school content learning often overlook the learning and literacy practices that youth engage in apart from their school-based, content learning.

    “Typical approaches to secondary school content learning often overlook the learning and literacy practices that youth engage in apart from their school-based, content learning (e.g., Hull & Schultz, 2002;Leander & Lovvorn, 2006;Lee, 2007;Moje, 2002;Tatum, 2008).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leander, K. M., & Lovvorn, J. F.
Affiliations
Vanderbilt University (US)
Venue
Cognition and Instruction
Published
2006-08
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
291-340
ISSN
  • 0737-0008 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-690X
OpenAlex
W2023736907
Cited by
168
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 12
FWCI
174.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cognition and Instruction (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Literacy, Media, and Education
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Linguistics and Education Research
Keywords
literacy practices, space-time relationship, circulation of texts, massively multiplayer online games, school literacy, youth identity, agency, translation, network continuity, actor-network theory, out-of-school learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review