Literacy Networks: Following the Circulation of Texts, Bodies, and Objects in the Schooling and Online Gaming of One Youth
Abstract
In this article, we offer an approach to conceiving of the relation between literacy practices and space–time. Literacy, embedded in other forms of activity, has a unique role in producing and organizing space–time relations, and such relations provide for different forms of cognition and learning. Closely examining how literacy practices produce and organize space–time helps researchers move beyond folk distinctions based on setting or context, such as "in school," versus "out of school," which necessarily associate different settings with different practices. Drawing on actor network theory, we propose a new way of reconceiving of literacy and its relations to space–time through the construct of the literacy network. We define and develop 5 space–time dimensions of literacy networks, including translation, the heterogeneity of space–time representations, movements and positions of texts in circulation, rhythms and speeds of circulation, and network continuity. Drawing on these dimensions, we analyze 3 different literacy networks that 1 youth, Brian, participates in, including 2 from school classrooms and 1 from his play of a massively multiplayer online game. We argue that the space–time dimensions of these networks have direct relevance to understanding Brian's engagement, agency, and identity.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Students engage in literacy practices and learning outside of school, learning they consider powerful and important.
“Students also engage in literacy practices and learning outside of school, learning they consider powerful and important.”
From Foregrounding the Disciplines in Secondary Literacy Teaching and Learning: A Call for Change (2008) · cites this paper as Leander & Lovvorn, 2006
Typical approaches to secondary school content learning often overlook the learning and literacy practices that youth engage in apart from their school-based, content learning.
“Typical approaches to secondary school content learning often overlook the learning and literacy practices that youth engage in apart from their school-based, content learning (e.g., Hull & Schultz, 2002;Leander & Lovvorn, 2006;Lee, 2007;Moje, 2002;Tatum, 2008).”
From Foregrounding the Disciplines in Secondary Literacy Teaching and Learning: A Call for Change (2008) · cites this paper as Leander & Lovvorn, 2006
Cites
Handbook of Qualitative Research
Crozier, G., Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (1994) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.2307/3121684 · Cited by 26,636 · see citing works
What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy
Gee, J. P. (2003) · Computers in Entertainment · doi:10.1145/950566.950595 · Cited by 5,735 · see citing works
The Rise of the Network Society
Castells, M. (2009) · doi:10.1002/9781444319514 · Cited by 4,664 · see citing works
Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity
Law, J. (1992) · Systems Practice · doi:10.1007/bf01059830 · Cited by 3,244 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Foregrounding the Disciplines in Secondary Literacy Teaching and Learning: A Call for Change
Moje, E. B. (2008) · Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy · doi:10.1598/jaal.52.2.1 · Cited by 785 · see citing works
Literacy and Identity: Examining the Metaphors in History and Contemporary Research
Moje, E. B., & Luke, A. (2009) · Reading Research Quarterly · doi:10.1598/rrq.44.4.7 · Cited by 444 · see citing works
“The Tail Wagging the Dog”: High-Stakes Testing as a Mediating Context in Secondary Literacy-Related
Learned, J. E., Dacus, L. C., Morgan, M. J., Schiller, K. S., & Gorgun, G. (2020) · Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1177/016146812012201115 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
- Authors
- Leander, K. M., & Lovvorn, J. F.
- Affiliations
- Vanderbilt University (US)
- Venue
- Cognition and Instruction
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2006-08
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 291-340
- ISSN
- 0737-0008 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-690X
- OpenAlex
- W2023736907
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 174.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cognition and Instruction (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Literacy, Media, and Education
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Linguistics and Education Research
- Keywords
- literacy practices, space-time relationship, circulation of texts, massively multiplayer online games, school literacy, youth identity, agency, translation, network continuity, actor-network theory, out-of-school learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review