Drawing Abilities in Williams Syndrome: A Case Study
Abstract
It has been well documented that the effects of early occurring brain injury are often attenuated relative to later occurring injury. The traditional neuropsychological account of these observations is that, although the developing neural system normally proceeds along a well-specified maturational course, it has a transient capacity for plastic reorganization that can be recruited in the wake of injury. This characterization of early neural plasticity is limited and fails to capture the much more pervasive role of plasticity in development. This article examines the role of neural plasticity in development and learning. Data from both animal and human studies show that plasticity plays a central role in the normal development of neural systems allowing for adaptation and response to both exogenous and endogenous input. The capacity for reorganization and change is a critical feature of neural development, particularly in the postnatal period. Subtractive processes play a major role in the shaping and sculpting of neural organization. However, plasticity is neither transient nor unique to developing organisms. With development, neural systems stabilize and optimal patterns of functioning are achieved. Stabilization reduces, but does not eliminate, the capacity of the system to adapt. As the system stabilizes, plasticity becomes a less prominent feature of neural functioning, but it is not absent from the adult system. The implications of this broader view of plasticity for our understanding of development following early brain damage are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Understanding normal brain maturation is essential for understanding neurodevelopmental disorders.
“understanding normal brain maturation is essential for understanding neurodevelopmental disorders (4, 5).”
From Dynamic mapping of human cortical development during childhood through early adulthood (2004) · cites this paper as [4]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 120 · Cited by 236
- Authors
- Stiles, J.
- Affiliations
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Corresponding author
- Stiles, Joan
- Venue
- Developmental Neuropsychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2000-10
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 237-272
- ISSN
- 1532-6942 (ISSN-L)
- 8756-5641
- OpenAlex
- W2579428560
- Cited by
- 236
- References
- 120
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 1.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Developmental Neuropsychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5r01hd025077-10)
- National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (P50-DC01289, P50DC001289)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (P50 NS 22343, P50NS022343)
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01 HD 25077)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Williams Syndrome Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Keywords
- Williams syndrome, drawing skills, neuroplasticity, brain injury, neural development, postnatal development, stabilizing selection, developmental plasticity
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Age Factors, Animals, Brain Injuries, Child, Child Development, Cognition, Humans, Learning, Neuronal Plasticity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review