Cited by 236Williams Syndrome ResearchDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyAutism Spectrum Disorder Research

Drawing Abilities in Williams Syndrome: A Case Study

Stiles, Joan·2000·Developmental Neuropsychology

Abstract

It has been well documented that the effects of early occurring brain injury are often attenuated relative to later occurring injury. The traditional neuropsychological account of these observations is that, although the developing neural system normally proceeds along a well-specified maturational course, it has a transient capacity for plastic reorganization that can be recruited in the wake of injury. This characterization of early neural plasticity is limited and fails to capture the much more pervasive role of plasticity in development. This article examines the role of neural plasticity in development and learning. Data from both animal and human studies show that plasticity plays a central role in the normal development of neural systems allowing for adaptation and response to both exogenous and endogenous input. The capacity for reorganization and change is a critical feature of neural development, particularly in the postnatal period. Subtractive processes play a major role in the shaping and sculpting of neural organization. However, plasticity is neither transient nor unique to developing organisms. With development, neural systems stabilize and optimal patterns of functioning are achieved. Stabilization reduces, but does not eliminate, the capacity of the system to adapt. As the system stabilizes, plasticity becomes a less prominent feature of neural functioning, but it is not absent from the adult system. The implications of this broader view of plasticity for our understanding of development following early brain damage are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15326942dn1802_5

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 120 · Cited by 236

Authors
Stiles, J.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Stiles, Joan
Venue
Developmental Neuropsychology
Published
2000-10
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
237-272
ISSN
  • 1532-6942 (ISSN-L)
  • 8756-5641
OpenAlex
W2579428560
Cited by
236
References
120
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 18
FWCI
1.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Developmental Neuropsychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01hd025077-10)
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (P50-DC01289, P50DC001289)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (P50 NS 22343, P50NS022343)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01 HD 25077)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Williams Syndrome Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Keywords
Williams syndrome, drawing skills, neuroplasticity, brain injury, neural development, postnatal development, stabilizing selection, developmental plasticity
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Animals, Brain Injuries, Child, Child Development, Cognition, Humans, Learning, Neuronal Plasticity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review