The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Epistemic forms and Epistemic Games: Structures and Strategies to Guide Inquiry
Abstract
Epistemic forms are target structures that guide inquiry. Epistemic games are general purpose strategies for analyzing phenomena in order to fill out a particular epistemic form. The article describes in detail the rules and moves for one epistemic game and briefly describes a catalog of epistemic games that are used to analyze phenomena in terms of their structure, function, or processes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: making science accessible to all students
White, B. Y., & Frederiksen, J. R. (1998) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1207/s1532690xci1601_2 · Cited by 1,394
Expanding the Dimensions of Epistemic Cognition: Arguments From Philosophy and Psychology
CHINN, C. A., BUCKLAND, L. A., & SAMARAPUNGAVAN, A. (2011) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2011.587722 · Cited by 524
Improvements to elementary children's epistemic understanding from sustained argumentation
Ryu, S., & Sandoval, W. A. (2012) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.21006 · Cited by 294
Building a Conceptual Framework for Data Literacy
Gummer, E. S., & Mandinach, E. B. (2015) · Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1177/016146811511700401 · Cited by 263
Moreno, R., Ozogul, G., & Reisslein, M. (2011) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0021995 · Cited by 128
Metadata
- Authors
- Collins, A., & Ferguson, W.
- Venue
- Educational Psychologist
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1993-01-01
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 25-42
- ISSN
- 0046-1520 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-6985
- OpenAlex
- W2093099366
- Cited by
- 367
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 27.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
