The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reading and Writing Relations and Their Development
Abstract
A brief retrospective is first provided on the study of reading and writing relations. Next, it is suggested that research has supported the theoretical contention that reading and writing rely on analogous mental processes and isomorphic knowledge. Four basic types of shared knowledge are delineated. Then, reasons are articulated about why it is also important to consider the separability of reading and writing. Further, over time, as reading and writing are learned, the nature of their relation changes. A description is then offered of a preliminary developmental outlook on the relation of reading and writing. The article concludes with theoretical and practical implications for use of a developmental model.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
THE ROLE OF TUTORING IN PROBLEM SOLVING *
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x · Cited by 8,851
Shell, D. F., Colvin, C., & Bruning, R. H. (1995) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-0663.87.3.386 · Cited by 457
Cited by
Writing to Read: A Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Writing and Writing Instruction on Reading
Graham, S., & Hebert, M. (2011) · Harvard Educational Review · doi:10.17763/haer.81.4.t2k0m13756113566 · Cited by 563
Longcamp, M., Zerbato-Poudou, M.-T., & Velay, J.-L. (2005) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2004.10.019 · Cited by 434
The Routledge Handbook of Language Testing
(2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203181287 · Cited by 345
Formative Assessment and Writing: A Meta-Analysis
Graham, S., Hebert, M., & Harris, K. R. (2015) · The Elementary School Journal · doi:10.1086/681947 · Cited by 340
Essential Elements of Fostering and Teaching Reading Comprehension
Duke, N., Pearson, D., Strachan, S., & Billman, A. (2011) · What Research Has to Say About Reading Instruction · doi:10.1598/0829.03 · Cited by 331
Metadata
- Authors
- Fitzgerald, J., & Shanahan, T.
- Venue
- Educational Psychologist
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2000-01-01
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 39-50
- ISSN
- 0046-1520 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-6985
- OpenAlex
- W2080986288
- Cited by
- 695
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reading and Writing Relations and Their Development. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1207/s15326985ep3501_5
- The paper
- Fitzgerald, J., & Shanahan, T. (2000). Reading and Writing Relations and Their Development. Educational Psychologist. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3501_5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.