Knowledge, Complexity, and Understanding
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Many complexity scholars themselves have seen as one of the most alarming shortages the fact that complexity-based studies lack reflexivity and epistemological sensitivity.
“Indeed, many complexity scholars themselves have seen as one of the most alarming shortages the fact that complexity-based studies lack reflexivity and epistemological sensitivity (Cilliers, 2000;Maguire, McKelvey, Mirabeau, & Öztas, 2006;Richardson, 2011).”
From Complexity and Organizational Communication: A Quest for Common Ground (2016) · cites this paper as Cilliers, 2000
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Evidence, Understanding and Complexity: Evaluation in Non-Linear Systems
Barnes, M., Matka, E., & Sullivan, H. (2003) · Evaluation · doi:10.1177/13563890030093003 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Religion as a Complex and Dynamic System
Cho, F., & Squier, R. K. (2013) · Journal of the American Academy of Religion · doi:10.1093/jaarel/lft016 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Complexity and Organizational Communication: A Quest for Common Ground
Poutanen, P., Siira, K., & Aula, P. (2016) · Human Resource Development Review · doi:10.1177/1534484316639713 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cilliers, P.
- Corresponding author
- Cilliers, Paul
- Venue
- Emergence
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2000-12
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 7-13
- ISSN
- 1521-3250 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7000
- OpenAlex
- W1980543584
- Cited by
- 85
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 2.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Emergence (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Chaos, Complexity, and Education
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Systems and Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
- Keywords
- knowledge, complexity, understanding
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
