Cited by 65Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesHealth and Lifestyle StudiesMedia Influence and Health

The College Tradition of "Drink 'Til You Drop": The Relation Between Students' Social Networks and Engaging in Risky Behaviors

Dorsey, Alicia M., Scherer, Clifford W., Real, Kevin·1999·Health Communication

Abstract

Despite the empirical and anecdotal evidence of the growing problem of alcohol use and abuse on college campuses, there exists a high level of uncertainty regarding factors contributing to this particularly risky behavior. This article adopts a network approach to the study of risky behaviors exhibited among college students, particularly the excessive use of alcohol. Specifically, this investigation examines the role of to whom students are talking, with whom they are affiliated, and how frequently they are discussing potential effects of risky behaviors on the excessive use of alcohol. Two hundred thirty-nine undergraduate students completed a survey 1 week following an unofficial university-wide event celebrating the end of spring semester that traditionally revolves around the overconsumption of alcohol. Students were asked to report on a number of things, including their typical behaviors, behaviors they participated in at this particular event, and features of their social networks. Membership in Greek organizations on campus, the range of one's network, and the frequency of talking about drinking and potential consequences were all significantly related to drinking in excess. Implications of these findings and directions for future research are discussed at the conclusion of the article.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15327027hc1104_1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dorsey et al. (1999) found 80% of respondents with fraternity/sorority affiliations reported drinking in excess at a spring semester concert event, as compared with 43% of nonaffiliates.

    “Dorsey et al. (1999), in a single-institution study (n = 239 undergraduate students), found 80% of the respondents with fraternity/sorority affiliations reported drinking in excess at a spring semester concert event, as compared with 43% of nonaffiliates.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 50 · Cited by 65

Authors
Dorsey, A. M., Scherer, C. W., & Real, K.
Venue
Health Communication
Published
1999-10
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
313-334
ISSN
  • 1041-0236 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7027
OpenAlex
W2065678411
Cited by
65
References
50
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4
FWCI
0.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Health Communication (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Lifestyle Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
Keywords
university students, alcohol consumption, excessive drinking, risk-taking, social networks, network analysis, Greek organizations, underage drinking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review