The DOI matches its Crossref record.
THEORY: "Sacred Matters: Sanctification as a Vital Topic for the Psychology of Religion"
Abstract
In this article and those that follow, we suggest that sacred matters represent a vital interest for the psychology of religion. We note that people can perceive virtually any aspect of their lives as having divine character and significance. Furthermore, people can sanctify objects theistically as a manifestation of their images, beliefs, or experiences of God and nontheistically by investing objects with qualities that characterize divinity. We discuss several implications of sanctification for human functioning: people invest a great deal of time and energy in sacred matters; people go to great lengths to preserve and protect whatever they perceive to be sacred; sacred aspects of life elicit spiritual emotions; sanctification offers a powerful personal and social resource that people can tap throughout their lives; and the loss of the sacred can have devastating effects. We conclude with a call for further studies of sacred matters and specific directions for research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Religion in Families, 1999–2009: A Relational Spirituality Framework
Mahoney, A. (2010) · Journal of Marriage and Family · doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00732.x · Cited by 554
Self-citationReligiousness/Spirituality and Health: A Meaning Systems Perspective
Park, C. L. (2007) · Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10865-007-9111-x · Cited by 438
The multidimensional existential meaning scale: a tripartite approach to measuring meaning in life
George, L. S., & Park, C. L. (2017) · The Journal of Positive Psychology · doi:10.1080/17439760.2016.1209546 · Cited by 379
Religion and child development: Evidence from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study
Bartkowski, J. P., Xu, X., & Levin, M. L. (2008) · Social Science Research · doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2007.02.001 · Cited by 269
Perspectives on “Sacred Moments” in Psychotherapy
Lomax, J. W., Kripal, J. J., & Pargament, K. I. (2011) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.10050739 · Cited by 50
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Pargament, K. I., & Mahoney, A.
- Venue
- International Journal for the Psychology of Religion
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-07
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 179-198
- ISSN
- 1050-8619 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7582
- OpenAlex
- W2031396096
- Cited by
- 426
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THEORY: "Sacred Matters: Sanctification as a Vital Topic for the Psychology of Religion". https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1207/s15327582ijpr1503_1
- The paper
- Pargament, K. I., & Mahoney, A. (2005). THEORY: "Sacred Matters: Sanctification as a Vital Topic for the Psychology of Religion". International Journal for the Psychology of Religion. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327582ijpr1503_1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.