Habituating antelope and bison to cooperate with veterinary procedures
Abstract
Undomesticated, wild, nonhuman animals with an excitable temperament frequently sustain injuries when handled for veterinary procedures such as blood sampling or injections. Both bison and antelope may become agitated when they are restrained, often resulting in broken horns. Also, antelope may panic when restraint is forced on them suddenly. This research group has successfully trained both Bongo and Nyala antelope to enter a box voluntarily for food rewards. While quiet, nonsedated antelope were standing in the box, blood samples were taken from their rear legs. Three Bongo antelope who had been conditioned to stand in the box had low cortisol levels that averaged 4.4 ± 3.4 ng/ml in a male and 8.5 ± 4.7 ng/ml in two females. The unsedated animals were held in the box for 10-20 min to allow cortisol levels to rise. These values were much lower than cortisol levels reported in the literature for restrained unsedated wild ruminants and domestic cattle who are not habituated to restraint. Because antelope are flighty animals, each new step in the conditioning process had to be introduced in very small steps to prevent panic. In another experiment, bison calves were trained to walk through the handling chutes for feed rewards. In both species, avoiding panic is important, especially in the early stages of training.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Positive reinforcement training has been used successfully to train zoo animals to participate in their care for many procedures, including crate training, blood draws, X-rays, dental care, and weighing.
“Positive reinforcement training (PRT) has been used successfully to train animals in zoos to participate in their care for a variety of procedures for many years, including crate training [57,58], blood draws [59,60], X-rays, dental care, weighing, and other procedures [61].”
From The Concept of Agency, Animal Wellbeing, and the Practical Realities of Ex Situ Breeding Programs in Zoos and Aquariums (2024) · cites this paper as [57]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Norman, M., & Brando, S. (2024) · Journal of Zoological and Botanical Gardens · doi:10.3390/jzbg5040038 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“Positive reinforcement training (PRT) has been used successfully to train animals in zoos to participate in their care for a variety of procedures for many years, including crate training [57,58], blood draws [59,60], X-rays, dental care, weighing, and other procedures [61].”
- Authors
- Grandin, T.
- Corresponding author
- Grandin, Temple
- ORCID
- Grandin, Temple
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2000-07
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 253-261
- ISSN
- 1088-8705 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7604
- OpenAlex
- W2039475543
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science (publishedVersion)
- Brock University Digital Repository (Brock University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Equine › Veterinary Equine Medical Research
- Keywords
- antelope, bison, habituation, veterinary procedures, restraint, blood sampling, cortisol, bongo, nyala, wild ungulates, animal welfare
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review