Cited by 46

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Rates of Euthanasia and Adoption for Dogs and Cats in Michigan Animal Shelters

Bartlett, Paul C., Bartlett, Andrew, Walshaw, Sally, Halstead, Stephen·2005·Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science

Abstract

Estimates of canine and feline euthanasia at U.S. animal shelters--largely based on voluntary surveys with low response rates--make it difficult to estimate the population from which the euthanized animals derive. Estimates of euthanasia rates (animals euthanized per unit of population) have varied widely and been available only sporadically. This study used requirements of Michigan state law (Pet Shops, Dog Pounds, and Animal Shelters Act, 1969) for animal shelters to collect admission and discharge data for all 176 Michigan-licensed animal shelters. In 2003, Michigan shelters discharged 140,653 dogs: Of these, 56,972 (40%) were euthanized; 40,005 (28%) were adopted. This annual euthanasia rate is 2.6% of the estimated 2003 Michigan dog population. Michigan shelters discharged 134,405 cats in 2003: 76,321 (57%) by euthanasia and (24%) by adoption. The estimated ratio of euthanized cats to cats who had owners was 3.1%. Small shelters and privately owned shelters were associated with higher adoption rates. Comparison with historical information from the past 10 to 20 years suggests the number of companion animals being euthanized in shelters has decreased and that progress has been made in reducing the companion animal overpopulation problem.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15327604jaws0802_2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Arkow P., 1994, " Anthrozoos, 7, 202, 10.2752/089279394787001817 · DOI
  2. Carter C. N., 1990, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 197, 192
  3. Grant, 2010, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 225, 668
  4. Ott R. S., 1990, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 197, 1134, 10.2460/javma.1990.197.09.1134 · DOI
  5. Patronek G. J., 1996, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 209, 573
  6. Patronek G., 1995, Anthrozoos, 8, 199, 10.2752/089279395787156590 · DOI
  7. Rowan. A. & Wilson, A. (Eds.). (1985). Animal management and population control: What progress have we made? North Grafton, MA: Tufts Center for Animals and Public Policy.
  8. SAS Institute. (1985). SAS user's guide: Statistics (5th ed.). Cary, NC: Author.
  9. Scarlett J. M., 1999, Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 2, 41, 10.1207/s15327604jaws0201_4 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Thorton G., 1991, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 198, 1352, 10.2460/javma.1991.198.08.1352 · DOI
  11. White D. J., 1996, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 208, 846, 10.2460/javma.1996.208.06.846 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Bartlett, P. C., Bartlett, A., Walshaw, S., & Halstead, S.
Venue
Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science
Published
2005-04
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
97-104
ISSN
  • 1088-8705
  • 1532-7604
Cited by
46
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review