The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Corporate Sponsorships of Philanthropic Activities: When Do They Impact Perception of Sponsor Brand?
Open accessAbstract
We examined the benefits to a corporate sponsor of two types of philanthropic activities — cause promotions and advocacy advertising. Results from 4 laboratory studies indicate that perceptions of corporate social responsibility (CSR) are affected by consumers’ elaboration levels. Consumer perceptions of CSR are more favorable for cause promotions, which do not receive much elaboration, than they are for advocacy advertising, which prompts more elaboration. In addition, perceived congruence between the sponsor and the social issue is shown to moderate these effects: Higher congruence between the sponsor and social issue increases favorable ratings of CSR for cause promotions but only if elaboration on the sponsorship activity is facilitated. On the other hand, lower congruence increases favorable ratings of CSR for advocacy advertising as long as elaboration on the sponsorship is not constrained. We also found that higher congruence enhances CSR ratings if participants are primed to focus their attention on the sponsor brand, whereas lower congruence enhances CSR if participants are primed to focus their attention on the social issue.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Does Doing Good Always Lead to Doing Better? Consumer Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility
Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2001) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.38.2.225.18838 · Cited by 4,659
The Persuasion Knowledge Model: How People Cope with Persuasion Attempts
Friestad, M., & Wright, P. (1994) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209380 · Cited by 3,811
Heart and Mind in Conflict: The Interplay of Affect and Cognition in Consumer Decision Making
Shiv, B., & Fedorikhin, A. (1999) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209563 · Cited by 2,044
Campbell, M. C., & Kirmani, A. (2000) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/314309 · Cited by 1,342
Cited by
Maximizing business returns to corporate social responsibility (CSR): The role of CSR communication
Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2010) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00276.x · Cited by 2,633
The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Activities on Companies With Bad Reputations
Yoon, Y., Gürhan‐Canli, Z., & Schwarz, N. (2006) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15327663jcp1604_9 · Cited by 1,429
Reaping relational rewards from corporate social responsibility: The role of competitive positioning
Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2007) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2007.01.001 · Cited by 1,295
Alcañiz, E. B., Cáceres, R. C., & Pérez, R. C. (2010) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-010-0461-x · Cited by 291
Time versus money: The role of perceived effort in consumers' evaluation of corporate giving
Langan, R., & Kumar, A. (2019) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.02.016 · Cited by 61
Metadata
- Authors
- Menon, S., & Kahn, B. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Consumer Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 316-327
- ISSN
- 1057-7408 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7663
- OpenAlex
- W1994685180
- Cited by
- 571
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 14.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Corporate Sponsorships of Philanthropic Activities: When Do They Impact Perception of Sponsor Brand? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1207/s15327663jcp1303_12
- The paper
- Menon, S., & Kahn, B. E. (2003). Corporate Sponsorships of Philanthropic Activities: When Do They Impact Perception of Sponsor Brand? Journal of Consumer Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1303_12
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.