Cited by 187Privacy, Security, and Data ProtectionCustomer Service Quality and LoyaltyConsumer Market Behavior and Pricing

Consumer Disclosure and Disclosure Avoidance: A Motivational Framework

Barnett White, Tiffany·2004·Journal of Consumer Psychology

Abstract

In this research, we investigate consumers’ motivations for disclosing personal information to relationship-seeking marketers. We explore the impact of consumers’ relationship perceptions, the nature of benefits offered by marketers in exchange for requested information, and the type of information requested on consumers’ disclosure willingness, focusing on consumers’ forecasts of 2 types of potential disclosure-related loss (i.e., loss of privacy and loss of face), which are shown to mediate this decision. The results of an experiment revealed that although participants with relatively deep relationship perceptions were more likely to reveal “privacy-related” personal information, they were more reluctant to reveal embarrassing information. The findings also suggest that although loyal customers found the exchange of privacy-related personal information for customized benefit offerings (relative to noncustomized offerings) attractive, the reverse was true for embarrassing information; these participants seemed to find the exchange of customized offerings for this latter type of information unattractive. We discuss the theoretical and practical implications of the findings for consumer researchers and relationship-seeking marketing practitioners.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15327663jcp1401&2_6

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • InfCC related to prior personalized services or products constitute a negative online experience, likely decreasing users' overall willingness to share information for personalization.

    “InfCC related to prior personalized services or products (e.g., personalized recommendations) constitute a negative online experience, likely decreasing users' overall willingness to share information for personalization (Barnett White, 2004).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barnett White, T.
Affiliations
Department of Business Administration, University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign
Venue
Journal of Consumer Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-01
Volume
14
Issue
1-2
Pages
41-51
ISSN
  • 1057-7408 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7663
OpenAlex
W1969502195
Cited by
187
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 6
FWCI
12.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consumer Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • Journal of Consumer Psychology
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
Keywords
consumer disclosure, disclosure avoidance, personal data, relationship perceptions, privacy loss, loss of face, customer loyalty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review