Consumer Disclosure and Disclosure Avoidance: A Motivational Framework
Abstract
In this research, we investigate consumers’ motivations for disclosing personal information to relationship-seeking marketers. We explore the impact of consumers’ relationship perceptions, the nature of benefits offered by marketers in exchange for requested information, and the type of information requested on consumers’ disclosure willingness, focusing on consumers’ forecasts of 2 types of potential disclosure-related loss (i.e., loss of privacy and loss of face), which are shown to mediate this decision. The results of an experiment revealed that although participants with relatively deep relationship perceptions were more likely to reveal “privacy-related” personal information, they were more reluctant to reveal embarrassing information. The findings also suggest that although loyal customers found the exchange of privacy-related personal information for customized benefit offerings (relative to noncustomized offerings) attractive, the reverse was true for embarrassing information; these participants seemed to find the exchange of customized offerings for this latter type of information unattractive. We discuss the theoretical and practical implications of the findings for consumer researchers and relationship-seeking marketing practitioners.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
InfCC related to prior personalized services or products constitute a negative online experience, likely decreasing users' overall willingness to share information for personalization.
“InfCC related to prior personalized services or products (e.g., personalized recommendations) constitute a negative online experience, likely decreasing users' overall willingness to share information for personalization (Barnett White, 2004).”
From Transformative privacy calculus: Conceptualizing the personalization‐privacy paradox on social media (2024) · cites this paper as Barnett White, 2004
Cites
Intimate Exchanges: Using Computers to Elicit Self-Disclosure from Consumers
Moon, Y. (2000) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209566 · Cited by 842 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The role of data privacy in marketing
Martin, K. D., & Murphy, P. E. (2017) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-016-0495-4 · Cited by 902 · see citing works
YOUN, S. (2009) · Journal of Consumer Affairs · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6606.2009.01146.x · Cited by 449 · see citing works
Strangers on a Plane: Context-Dependent Willingness to Divulge Sensitive Information
John, L. K., Acquisti, A., & Loewenstein, G. (2011) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/656423 · Cited by 414 · see citing works
Getting Too Personal: Reactance to Highly Personalized Email Solicitations
White, T. B., Zahay, D. L., Thorbjørnsen, H., & Shavitt, S. (2008) · Marketing Letters · doi:10.1007/s11002-007-9027-9 · Cited by 365 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Impact of Relative Standards on the Propensity to Disclose
Acquisti, A., John, L. K., & Loewenstein, G. (2012) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmr.09.0215 · Cited by 247 · see citing works
Do you mind if I ask you a personal question? How AI service agents alter consumer self-disclosure
Kim, T. W., Jiang, L., Duhachek, A., Lee, H., & Garvey, A. (2022) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/10946705221120232 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
Transformative privacy calculus: Conceptualizing the personalization‐privacy paradox on social media
Cloarec, J., Meyer‐Waarden, L., & Munzel, A. (2024) · Psychology & Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.21998 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
de Cosmo, L. M., Piper, L., & Di Vittorio, A. (2021) · Italian Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1007/s43039-021-00020-1 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Chen, X., Sun, J., & Liu, H. (2022) · Journal of Consumer Behaviour · doi:10.1002/cb.1947 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Wang, S., Chen, Z., Xiao, Y., & Lin, C. (2021) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2021.705777 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
- Authors
- Barnett White, T.
- Affiliations
- Department of Business Administration, University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign
- Venue
- Journal of Consumer Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 41-51
- ISSN
- 1057-7408 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7663
- OpenAlex
- W1969502195
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 12.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Consumer Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Journal of Consumer Psychology
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
- Keywords
- consumer disclosure, disclosure avoidance, personal data, relationship perceptions, privacy loss, loss of face, customer loyalty
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review