The structure of death anxiety: A factor analytic study
Abstract
University students in Canada (n = 255) and Northern Ireland (n = 315), graduate nursing students (n = 124), funeral service students (n = 79), and members of the Unitarian Fellowship (n = 83) completed Templer's Death Anxiety Scale (DAS). The responses of each group were subjected to principal components factor analysis using varimax rotational procedures and the factor scores derived from this analysis were then contrasted using multiple discriminant function analysis. Results indicated that there was more commonality than uniqueness in the factor patterns for these groups. Four common death anxiety patterns were classified as follows: (a) cognitive-affective concerns; (b) concern about physical alterations; (c) concern about the passage of time; and (d) concern about stressors and pain. These factors are consistent with and extend the views expressed in previous research (i.e., Pandy, 1974-75; Pandy & Templer, 1972.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Unidimensional measures have been found to tap into multiple dimensions of death anxiety.
“these unidimensional measures have also been found to tap into multiple dimensions of death anxiety”
From Death anxiety and its role in psychopathology: Reviewing the status of a transdiagnostic construct (2014) · cites this paper as Lonetto, Fleming, & Mercer, 1979
Cites
The sense of immortality: On death and the continuity of life.
Lifton, R. J. (1973) · The American Journal of Psychoanalysis · doi:10.1007/bf01872131 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Death anxiety and its role in psychopathology: Reviewing the status of a transdiagnostic construct
Iverach, L., Menzies, R. G., & Menzies, R. E. (2014) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2014.09.002 · Cited by 459 · see citing works
Relationship of death anxiety scale factors to subjective states
Gilliland, J. C., & Templer, D. I. (1986) · OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying · doi:10.2190/y9y8-rg8n-8euh-vjv4 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Using the Templer Scale to assess “death anxiety”: A cautionary note
Durlak, J. A. (1982) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.1982.50.3c.1257 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Perceptions of two therapeutic approaches for palliative care patients experiencing death anxiety.
Sussman, J. C., & Liu, W. M. (2014) · Palliative and Supportive Care · doi:10.1017/s1478951513000199 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lonetto, R., Fleming, S., & Mercer, G. W.
- ORCID
- Mercer, G. William
- Venue
- Journal of Personality Assessment
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1979-08
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 388-392
- ISSN
- 0022-3891 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7752
- OpenAlex
- W2060225847
- Cited by
- 51
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 2.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Personality Assessment (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- fear of death, university students, nursing students, cross-cultural comparison
- MeSH terms
- Anxiety, Attitude to Death, Female, Humans, Male, Psychological Tests
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review