The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Replicable Item-Cluster Subcomponents in the NEO Five-Factor Inventory
Abstract
The popular NEO Personality Inventory-Revised (NEO-PI-R) has a short form--the NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI)--that taps the five broad factors with fidelity and reliability. However, conventional scoring of this short form does not provide scores on more specific aspects of the broad-bandwidth factors. In this study, 13 item clusters were found to replicate across halves of a sample of self-descriptions by adults (N = 732). Thirteen factor-analytically derived scales were developed for the item clusters. The scales demonstrated reliability and factor structure comparable to that of the 30 facet scales of the NEO-PI-R. Correlation and multiple regression analyses showed that the content coverage of the 13 scales has high overlap with that of the NEO-PI-R facet scales, but that representation of some facet scales is more moderate. Archival and existing data involving the NEO-FFI can be easily rescored for these 13 subcomponents, increasing the researcher's gain of information from this convenient personality inventory.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–189 of 189
Gooding, D. C., Padrutt, E. R., & Pflum, M. J. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00147 · Cited by 23
“The 13 factor-analytic derived item clusters and their adjective descriptors provided by Saucier (1997, 1998) provide greater fidelity with which to describe the personality characteristics of the respondents for the NEO-FFI.”
MethodResultRevisiting the big six and the big five among Hong Kong university students
Zhang, L. (2007) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/01443410701366092 · Cited by 23
“A brief version of the NEO-PI is the NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI; Costa & McCrae, 1992), which also has been successful in reliably measuring the five personality dimensions (e.g., Courneya & Hellsten, 1998; Saucier, 1998).”
MethodSghaireen, M. G., & AL-Omiri, M. K. (2015) · Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry · doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.07.009 · Cited by 22
“The NEO-FFI test was used in this study because it is simple, valid, reliable, sensitive, and uncomplicated to use statistically; it can also be completed quickly and offers comprehensive measurement of the 5 dimensions of personality.(2-5,28,29) Previous studies have used different tools to evaluate psychological sta…”
MethodAlhaija, E. S. A., Nabaa, M. A. A., Maaitah, E. F. A., et al. (2014) · The Angle Orthodontist · doi:10.2319/121813-927.1 · Cited by 22
Rivis, A., Sheeran, P., & Armitage, C. J. (2009) · Psychology and Health · doi:10.1080/08870440903427365 · Cited by 22
“Specifically, compared to antagonistic individuals, agreeable individuals are more pro-social in their orientation (Saucier, 1998) and also score higher on measures of self-control and assertiveness (Sneed, 2007).”
BackgroundBenedict, R. H. B., Wahlig, E. L., Topciu, R. A., Englert, J. J., Schwartz, E. S., Chapman, B. P., Weinstock‐Guttman, B., & Duberstein, P. R. (2008) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2008.09.007 · Cited by 22
“Where significance was found at the level of the five overall NEOFFI domains, we measured NEOFFI domain component scores derived from different combinations of NEOFFI items that are clustered to yield subcomponents of each general domain [55,56].”
MethodChaku, N., Kelly, D. P., & Beltz, A. M. (2021) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2021.106772 · Cited by 21
Daily gender expression is associated with psychological adjustment for some people, but mainly men
Beltz, A. M., Loviska, A. M., & Weigard, A. S. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-88279-4 · Cited by 21
Conscientiousness and deterioration in employment status in multiple sclerosis over 3 years
Jaworski, M. G., Fuchs, T. A., Dwyer, M. G., Wojcik, C. M., Zivadinov, R., Weinstock‐Guttman, B., & Benedict, R. H. B. (2020) · Multiple Sclerosis Journal · doi:10.1177/1352458520946019 · Cited by 20
van Doorn, R. R. A., & Lang, J. W. B. (2010) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2010.05.004 · Cited by 20
“The two neuroticism facets in the NEO-FFI were found to be replicable across different samples (Chapman, 2007; Saucier, 1998).”
BackgroundInfluentialBrents, L. K., Tripathi, S. P., Young, J., James, G. A., & Kilts, C. D. (2015) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2015.02.015 · Cited by 20
“Neuroticism is subserved by the facets self-reproach and negative affect; extraversion is subserved by positive affect, sociability, and activity; openness is subserved by esthetic interests, intellectual interests, and unconventionality; agreeableness is subserved by nonantagonistic orientation and prosocial orientat…”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialHeterogeneity in affective complexity among men and women.
Foster, K. T., & Beltz, A. M. (2021) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/emo0000956 · Cited by 20
Taylor, C. T., Rosenfield, D., Dowd, S. M., Dutcher, C. D., Hofmann, S. G., Otto, M. W., Pollack, M. H., & Smits, J. A. J. (2023) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2023.104436 · Cited by 20
“Research supports a 4-item positive emotions scale within the domain of extraversion (items: laughs easily; not cheerful or light-hearted [R]; cheerful, vivacious; not a cheerful optimist [R]) (Chapman, 2007; Saucier, 1998).”
Dewberry, C., Davies‐Muir, A., & Newell, S. J. (2013) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/ijsa.12038 · Cited by 18
Principal Components Analyses of the MMPI-2 PSY-5 Scales
Arnau, R. C., Handel, R. W., & Archer, R. P. (2005) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/1073191105274750 · Cited by 17
“In terms of personality pathology, some of the details alluded to by Saucier may have to do with the differential patterns of relationships between facets and personality disorders. Widiger, Trull, Clarkin, Sanderson, and Costa (2002) provided a good example when they described low Agreeableness as characteristic of b…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialPersonality traits and occupational stress among Chinese academics
Zhang, L. (2012) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/01443410.2012.746641 · Cited by 17
“A short version of the NEO-PI is the NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI, Costa & McCrae, 1992), which also has been proved to reliably assess the five personality dimensions (e.g. Saucier, 1998).”
MethodYounger, J., Finan, P. H., Zautra, A., Davis, M. C., & Reich, J. W. (2008) · Psychology and Health · doi:10.1080/08870440701596593 · Cited by 18
Schulze, R., & Roberts, R. D. (2006) · Zeitschrift für Psychologie · doi:10.1026/0044-3409.214.3.133 · Cited by 16
Zhang, Y., Zhang, R., & Feng, T. (2021) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2021.11.036 · Cited by 15
Abzari, M., Shahin, A., & Abasaltian, A. (2014) · Kuwait Chapter of Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review · doi:10.12816/0018907 · Cited by 15
The quality of the relationship perceived by spouses of people with young-onset dementia
Bruinsma, J., Peetoom, K. K. B., Millenaar, J., Köhler, S., Bakker, C., Koopmans, R. T. C. M., Pijnenburg, Y. A. L., Verhey, F. R. J., & de Vugt, M. E. (2020) · International Psychogeriatrics · doi:10.1017/s1041610220000332 · Cited by 17
“In line with Chap-man (2007) and Saucier (1998), two subscales of neuroticism were assessed: negative affect (items 1, 11, 16, 31, and 46) and self-reproach (items 6, 21, 26, 36, 41, 51, and 56).”
Curiosity across the adult lifespan: Age-related differences in state and trait curiosity
Whatley, M. C., Murayama, K., Sakaki, M., & Castel, A. D. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0320600 · Cited by 15
“In addition to trivia questions and ECS, we preregistered the intellectual curiosity (IC) facet from the openness to experience subscale of the larger Five Factor Inventory [56,57] as the other trait curiosity measure.”
Personality Dimensions and Versions of “Spirituality”
Streib, H., Klein, C., & Hood, R. W. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-21245-6_12 · Cited by 13
Leong, M., Wang, A. D. W., Trainor, D., Johnstone, B., Rayner, G., Kalinčík, T., Roos, I., Kwan, P., O'Brien, T. J., Velakoulis, D., et al. (2019) · Seizure · doi:10.1016/j.seizure.2019.10.011 · Cited by 13
Social-Cognitive Predictors of Iranian College Students’ Academic Well-Being
Sadeghi, A., & Mahdavi, F. (2019) · Journal of Career Development · doi:10.1177/0894845319826275 · Cited by 13
“In this commonly used questionnaire (Saucier, 1998), responses are made on a 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree) for each of the five 12-item scales.”
MethodPizur‐Barnekow, K., & Knutson, J. (2009) · Journal of Occupational Science · doi:10.1080/14427591.2009.9686657 · Cited by 13
“The NEO Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI), which was developed as a shorter alternative to the NEO-PI-R, measures personality factors.”
MethodInfluentialThe Physician Values in Practice Scale-Short Form: Development and Initial Validation
Rogers, M. E., Creed, P. A., Searle, J., et al. (2010) · Journal of Career Development · doi:10.1177/0894845310363593 · Cited by 13
“It has a factor structure comparable with the full scale test (Saucier, 1998), satisfactory internal reliability coefficients for all subscales (ranging between .75 and .89), and considerable evidence supporting construct and criterion validity (Costa & McCrae, 1992).”
Holden, R. R., Wasylkiw, L., Starzyk, K. B., Book, A. S., & Edwards, M. J. (2006) · Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement · doi:10.1037/h0087268 · Cited by 12
Wolf, P. S. A., Figueredo, A. J., & Jacobs, W. J. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00315 · Cited by 12
Mike, A., Harris, K., Roberts, B. W., & Jackson, J. J. (2015) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-097086-8.25047-2 · Cited by 13
Lorek, M., Jarząbek, A., Sycińska-Dziarnowska, M., Gołąb, S., Krawczyk, K., Spagnuolo, G., Woźniak, K., & Szyszka‐Sommerfeld, L. (2024) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2024.1469992 · Cited by 11
Comparing countdown- and IRT-based approaches to computerized adaptive personality testing.
Rudick, M. M., Yam, W. H., & Simms, L. J. (2013) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/a0032541 · Cited by 11
A New Perspective on the Relationships between Individual Factors and Time Estimates
Bisson, N., & Grondin, S. (2019) · Timing & Time Perception · doi:10.1163/22134468-20191160 · Cited by 11
Schwaba, T., Rhemtulla, M., Hopwood, C. J., & Bleidorn, W. (2020) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/zskfu · Cited by 12
A NEO‐PI‐R short form for older adults
Mooi, B., Comijs, H., Fruyt, F. D., Ritter, D. D., Hoekstra, H., & Beekman, A. (2011) · International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1002/mpr.342 · Cited by 10
“Met 142 Reciprocal dependency between internal consistency and content range is implicit in a heterogenic construct such as personality (Saucier, 1998).”
BackgroundAssiri, K. I. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-78216-6 · Cited by 9
Botha, M., & Morallane, H. (2019) · South African Journal of Business Management · doi:10.4102/sajbm.v50i1.1323 · Cited by 9
“The two newly derived narrow personality traits, meekness and depression, can be included in future scales and can serve to build on the NEO-FFI narrow trait structure indicated by Saucier (1998).”
BackgroundMethodUSING PERSONALITY VARIABLES TO PREDICT ACADEMIC SUCCESS IN PERSONALIZED SYSTEM OF INSTRUCTION
Petska, K. S. (2006) · Lincoln (University of Nebraska) · Cited by 9
He, Y., Li, A., Li, K., & Xiao, J. (2021) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.11379 · Cited by 8
“Saucier G. 1998.”
MethodAL-Omiri, M. K., Abu‐Awwad, M., Bustani, M., et al. (2022) · International Journal of Dental Hygiene · doi:10.1111/idh.12642 · Cited by 8
Larmour, S. R., Bergstrøm, H., Gillen, C. T. A., et al. (2014) · Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology · doi:10.1007/s11896-014-9144-3 · Cited by 8
“Although the NEO-FFI is a conveniently shorter measure to complete, it may prove valuable to investigate compliance and false confession in relation to a more in-depth facet level of personality measurement (Saucier, 1998).”
BackgroundKlein, C., Keller, B., Silver, C. F., Hood, R. W., & Streib, H. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-21245-6_25 · Cited by 9
Boonyarit, I. (2021) · PsyCh Journal · doi:10.1002/pchj.435 · Cited by 7
AL-Omiri, M. K., Atieh, D. W. A., Nazeh, A. A. A., et al. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-55855-3 · Cited by 7
The Five Factor Model of Personality and Stuttering
Jafari, R., Shahbodaghi, R., Hasan, A., et al. (2014) · Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.261 · Cited by 7
Schulze, R., & Roberts, R. D. (2006) · Cited by 7
Roozen, H. G., Evans, B. E., Wiersema, H., & Meyers, R. J. (2009) · Journal of Behavior Analysis in Health Sports Fitness and Medicine · doi:10.1037/h0100374 · Cited by 7
Evaluation of virtual reality snowplow simulation training
Masciocchi, C. M. (2007) · Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University) · doi:10.31274/rtd-180813-15717 · Cited by 7
“Table 1 shows the means and standard deviations for each domain as reported by Rolland, Parker, and Stumpf (1998) in their study of 500 normative American males, and it presents the means from Saucier (1998) on his study of 732 American men and women.”
BackgroundInfluentialDeng, Z., Zhang, X., He, F., Zhang, S., Du, R., & Gao, Z. (2025) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.16852 · Cited by 6
Allen, T. A., Harkness, K. L., Lam, R. W. M., Milev, R. V., Frey, B. N., Müller, D. J., Uher, R., Kennedy, S. H., & Quilty, L. C. (2021) · Personality and Mental Health · doi:10.1002/pmh.1514 · Cited by 6
Jordi, S. B. U., Lang, B. M., Wyss, J., Auschra, B., Yılmaz, B., Krupka, N., Greuter, T., Schreiner, P., Biedermann, L., Preisig, M., et al. (2022) · Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1007/s00535-022-01902-7 · Cited by 6
“items to build 13 cluster subcomponents (for details see Supplementary Table 2) [22, 23].”
BackgroundMethodHatano, K., Kawamoto, T., Hihara, S., Sugimura, K., Ikeda, M., Tanaka, S. A., & Nakahara, J. (2023) · Journal of Youth and Adolescence · doi:10.1007/s10964-023-01918-z · Cited by 7
“Extraversion comprises several aspects, such as activity and positive effect on others and one ’ s environment and socia-bility (Saucier, 1998).”
Early Adoption of New Drug Treatments
Mascarenhas, D. D., Singh, B. K., Singh, A. H., & Veer, S. V. (2007) · Critical Pathways in Cardiology A Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine · doi:10.1097/01.hpc.0000257844.53130.d0 · Cited by 6
Defining the p-Factor: An Empirical Test of Five Leading TheoriesPreprint
Southward, M. W., Cheavens, J. S., & Coccaro, E. F. (2022) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/bszt4 · Cited by 6
Martin‐Storey, A., Serbin, L. A., Stack, D. M., Ledingham, J. E., & Schwartzman, A. E. (2012) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2012.06.018 · Cited by 6
Brents, L. K., James, G. A., Cisler, J. M., & Kilts, C. D. (2018) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2018.07.010 · Cited by 6
“These traits include neuroticism, extraversion, openness to experience, agreeableness, and conscientiousness (Costa and McCrae, 1992; Saucier, 1998).”
BackgroundMethodThe Relationship between Personality Profiles and the Esthetic Perception of Orthodontic Appliances
Pascoal, S., Gonçalves, M., Salvador, P., et al. (2024) · International Journal of Dentistry · doi:10.1155/2024/8827652 · Cited by 5
“Inorder to evaluate the relationship between personality traits, smile evaluation, and orthodontic appliances in the laypeople group, the NEO-FFI test was used since it offers a complete evaluation of the fi ve dimensions of personality [14, 15, 40, 41].”
BackgroundMethodFurther Tests of Belief-Importance Theory
Petrides, K. V., & Furnham, A. F. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0121978 · Cited by 10
“In addition to scores on the five higher-order factors, we also derived item-cluster scores following the procedures outlined in Saucier [13].”
MethodValidation française de l’Échelle de la personnalité temporelle
Bisson, N., Grondin, S., & Francis‐Smythe, J. (2015) · L’Année psychologique · doi:10.4074/s0003503315000196 · Cited by 4
Twelve-Month Stability of a Brief FFM Measure and Validity of Its Impulsigenic Facets
Assaad, L., Griffin, S. A., Derefinko, K. J., Lynam, D. R., & Samuel, D. B. (2021) · Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment · doi:10.1007/s10862-021-09933-9 · Cited by 4
“They found that the lower order scales suggested by Saucier (1998) exhibited test–retest stability coefficients of between 0.69 and 0.81 over a 12-month interval.”
BackgroundInfluentialAfshar, H., Roohafza, H., Keshteli, A. H., Sharbafchi, M. R., Feizi, A., & Adibi, P. (2015) · International journal of body, mind and culture · doi:10.22122/ijbmc.v2i2.32 · Cited by 5
Evaluation of Virtual Reality Snowplow Simulator Training: A Literature Review
Masciocchi, C. M., Dark, V. J., & Parkhurst, D. J. (2006) · Cited by 4
Downscaling with benefits: A road forward for capturing intra-individual variations in personality
Schock, A.-K., Hausinger, T., & Pletzer, B. A. (2024) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2024.112636 · Cited by 3
Lorek, M., Jarząbek, A., Sycińska-Dziarnowska, M., Gołąb, S., Cichocka, E., Spagnuolo, G., Woźniak, K., & Szyszka‐Sommerfeld, L. (2025) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2025.1547095 · Cited by 3
“In addition, it is easy to answer, score, and interpret and is well-documented in the literature (43–45).”
The Effect of Personality Traits and Gender on EFL Learner’s choice of Refusal Strategies
Miri, A., Rohani, G. R., & Ravand, H. (2015) · DergiPark (Istanbul University) · doi:10.17776/csj.46360 · Cited by 3
“Around half of the items, 23 out of 60, were reversed-keyed in the NEO-FFI in order to control for acquiescence bias (Aluja, Garcia, Rossier, Garcia, 2005; Saucier, 1998).”
MethodAbzari, M., Shahin, A., & Abasaltian, A. (2016) · Modern Applied Science · doi:10.5539/mas.v10n6p194 · Cited by 3
“Innovation promotion, standardization, avoid reworking, mitigating the errors, customer satisfaction, improving service quality and allocating resources optimistically are, inter alia, the aims of knowledge management in project – oriented organizations (Hanish et al, 2009; Tang and Nenmien, 2009; Singley and Anderson…”
BackgroundInfluentialRelationship between Perception of Maxillary Midline Diastema and Personality Profiles
Nazeh, A. A. A. (2016) · World Journal of Dentistry · doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1365 · Cited by 3
Chester, D. S., & West, S. J. (2020) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/jgefq · Cited by 3
Heterogeneity in Affective Complexity Among Men and WomenPreprint
Foster, K. T., & Beltz, A. M. (2020) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/a5ryv · Cited by 3
Lavonius, V., Keltikangas‐Järvinen, L., Lyytikäinen, L., Mishra, B. H., Sormunen, E., Kähönen, M. A. P., Raitakari, O. T., Hietala, J. A., Lehtimäki, T. J., & Saarinen, A. I. L. (2025) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2025.05.017 · Cited by 3
“Personality traits were assessed in 2007 and 2012 using a Finnish translation of the NEO-FFI scale (Costa, 1989), which is a modified and shortened version of the NEO Personality Inventory.”
InfluentialAl-Bitar, Z. B., Sonbol, H. N., Allawama, H. M., Rajab, L. D., Arqub, S. A., & AL-Omiri, M. K. (2025) · American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics · doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2024.12.009 · Cited by 2
AlZarea, B. K. (2019) · Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research · doi:10.1111/cid.12776 · Cited by 2
Rastgar-Farajzadeh, L., & Mohammadian, A. (2019) · The Neuroscience Journal of Shefaye Khatam · doi:10.29252/shefa.7.2.44 · Cited by 2
Mesbah, R., Koenders, M. A., Spijker, A. T., de Leeuw, M., Boschloo, L., Penninx, B. W. J. H., van Hemert, A. M., & Giltay, E. J. (2019) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2019.08.043 · Cited by 2
“Personality traits were determined using the NEO-FFI at baseline, which is a short version of NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) (Costa & McCrae, 1995).”
MethodSteele, J. C. (2004) · doi:10.33915/etd.2152 · Cited by 2
Big Five in University Students in Relation to Psychological and Entrepreneurial Competences
Kmecová, I., & Kajanová, A. (2021) · SHS Web of Conferences · doi:10.1051/shsconf/20219101036 · Cited by 1
How Reliable Are Personality Judgments by Political Experts? The Curious Case of Donald Trump
Joly, J., & Hofmans, J. (2023) · Personality Science · doi:10.5964/ps.6715 · Cited by 1
“…ratings of Trump’s personality, we examined inter-rater reliability for the full NEO-FFI questionnaire, for each of the Big Five traits, and for the 2) The full, anonymized, dataset, can be obtained in the Supplementary Materials The Curious Case of Donald Trump facets as defined by Saucier (1998).”
BackgroundMethodThe link between daily affective complexity and anxiety is altered by oral contraceptive use
Le, E., Chaku, N., Foster, K. T., Weigard, A. S., & Beltz, A. M. (2024) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2024.112310 · Cited by 1
Zhu, M., Zheng, Y., Fang, Y., Qiu, Q., & Li, X. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1612640 · Cited by 1
“Each item is scored on a scale from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating a more pronounced expression of the respective personality trait in the elderly (14, 38).”
Wolf, P. S. A. (2011) · UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) · Cited by 1
The Relationship Between Well-being, Sleep, Benevolence and Personality
Leitner, D. (2009) · cIRcle (University of British Columbia) · doi:10.14288/1.0086037 · Cited by 1
DÜŞÜNCE TARZLARI VE BEŞ BÜYÜK KİŞİLİK ÖZELLİĞİN TEKRAR GÖZDEN GEÇİRİLMESİ
Aslan, A. E., & Akkaya, E. (2008) · DergiPark (Istanbul University) · doi:10.15285/ebd.17070
Tatman, A. W. (2005) · ScholarWorks - WMU (Western Michigan University)
Himmelfarb, R. (2014) · Universitätsbibliothek der FU Berlin Hochschulschriftenstelle u. Dokumentenserver · doi:10.17169/refubium-2900
van der Hiele, K., van Egmond, E. E. A., van Gorp, D., Jongen, P. J., Reneman, M., van der Klink, J., Beenakker, E., van Eijk, J., Frequin, S. T. F. M., Hoitsma, E., et al. (2022) · Multiple Sclerosis Journal - Experimental Translational and Clinical · doi:10.1177/20552173221145576
Kaviyani, F., Hoseyni, M., Nazari, A., Akbarzadeh, M., & Hojjat, S. K. (2018) · Journal of North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences · doi:10.52547/nkums.10.2.113
Inchingolo, A. D., Marinelli, G., Carone, C., Fiore, A., Balestriere, L., Inchingolo, F., Palermo, A., Inchingolo, A. D., & Dipalma, G. (2026) · Advances in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.adoms.2026.100702
Abdelrazek, M. N., mahmoud, L. S., Mahmoud, M. F., et al. (2026) · BMC Nursing · doi:10.1186/s12912-026-05175-w
“In this study, the five domain scores were treated as continuous raw scores rather than converted to normative categories [18–20].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Saucier, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Oregon (US)
- Corresponding author
- Saucier, Gerard
- ORCID
- Saucier, Gerard
- Venue
- Journal of Personality Assessment
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1998-04
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 263-276
- ISSN
- 0022-3891 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7752
- OpenAlex
- W2032852152
- Cited by
- 188
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 0.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Personality Assessment (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5r01da008417-03)
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH49227)
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01-DA-08417)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Keywords
- NEO-FFI, NEO-PI-R, personality facets, personality assessment, factor structure, reliability statistics, self-report scale
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Personality Inventory, Psychometrics, United States, Reproducibility of Results
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review