The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Using Questioning to Guide Student Thinking
Abstract
This case study analyzes ways in which an experienced physics teacher uses questioning to guide student thinking during a benchmark discussion about measurement. Interactional issues involve ways of speaking: Why the teacher decided to ask what he did, when he did, of whom, in what way, and for what purpose. Conceptual issues involves ways of thinking: How students seemed to understand measurement concepts such as calculating an average value. We define a particular kind of question, a reflective toss, that the teacher uses to try to give students responsibility for thinking. A reflective toss sequence typically consists of a student statement, teacher question, and additional student statements. This unit of analysis directs attention to ways in which a teacher question influences student thinking. We analyze reflective tosses in terms of the immediate action plans they instantiated, the emergent goals they served, anal underlying beliefs they embodied during an episode that involved the public refinement of a student's ideas. We propose that teachers may shift toward more reflective discourse by asking questions that help students to make their meanings clear, to consider various points of view in a neutral manner, and to monitor the discussion and their own thinking.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“By doing this, the teachers not only validate the students' ideas and establish them as a baseline on which to build, but they shift the responsibility for knowledge construction back to the student and promote student-student collaboration”
From Young Children's Epistemic Operations and Emergent Argumentation in Inquiry‐Based Discussions: The Role of Teacher Questioning and Collaborative Interactions (2025) · cites this paper as van Zee and Minstrell 1997
Citations
Cites
Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching
SHULMAN, L. S. (1986) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x015002004 · Cited by 18,546
National Science Education Standards
Shea, J. H. (1995) · Journal of Geological Education · doi:10.5408/0022-1368-43.2.102 · Cited by 7,888
Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning
(1992) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.30-2122 · Cited by 6,131
Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change
Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.3730660207 · Cited by 5,187
Reciprocal Teaching of Comprehension-Fostering and Comprehension-Monitoring Activities
Palinscar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1207/s1532690xci0102_1 · Cited by 5,186
Talking science: language, learning, and values
Lemke, J. L. (1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-5211 · Cited by 4,001
The Journal of College Science Teaching
(1971) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/ed048p284 · Cited by 3,314
Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication
Bosco, J., Gumperz, J. J., & Hymes, D. H. (1973) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3585682 · Cited by 2,965
Learning Lessons: Social Organization in the Classroom
Mehan, H. (1979) · doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674420106 · Cited by 2,872
Learning to Think Mathematically: Problem Solving, Metacognition, and Sense Making in Mathematics
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2006) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-60752-874-620251019 · Cited by 2,792
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- Arons A., 1983, Duedalus, 2, 91
- Beach, L. R., Mitchell, T. R., Paluchowski, T. F. & van Zee, E. H. (1989). Image theory: Decision framing and decision deliberation. In F. Heller (Ed.), Decision making and leadership (pp. 172-188). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
- Dillon, J. T. (1988). Questioning andteaching: A manual ofpractice. New York: Teachers College Press.
- Mevarech Z., 1983, Educational Studies in Mathematiacs, 14, 4
- Minstrell, J. (1978). An evaluation ofthe Universiry of Washington program in physical science and science teaching for elementary school teachers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle.
- Minstrell, J. (1982a). Conceptual development research in the natural setting of a secondary school science classroom. In M. B. Rowe & W. S. Higuchi (Eds.), Education in the 80s: Science (pp. 129-143). Washington, DC: National Education Association.
- Minstrell, J . (1984). Teaching for the development of understanding of ideas: Forces on moving objects. In C. W. Anderson (Ed.), Observing science classrooms: Observing science perspectives from research andpractice (1984 Yearbook of the Association for Educators of Teachers of Science, pp. 53-72). Columbus: Ohio State University.
- Minstrell, J. (1989). Teaching science for understanding. In L. B. Resnick & L. E. Klopfer (Eds.), Toward the thinking curriculum: Current cognitive research (1989 Yearbook of the Association for Supervision and Cuniculum Development, pp. 131-149). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Cuniculum Development.
- Minstrell, J. (1992a). Facets of students' knowledge and relevant instruction. In R. Duit, F. Goldberg, & H. Niedderer (Eds.), Research in physics learning: Theoretical issues and empirical studies (pp. 110-128). Kiel, Germany: Institute for Science Education.
- Mokros J., 1995, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26, 20, 10.2307/749226 · DOI
- Philipsen G., 1982, The Communicator, 12, 4
- S c h h , D. A. (1988). Coachingreflective teaching. In P. P. Grimmett &G. L. Erickson(Eds.), Reflection in teacher education (pp. 19-29). New York: Teachers College Press.
- Shaughnessy, J. M. (1992).~esearch on probability and statistics: Reflections and directions. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 465-494). New York: Macmillan.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–101 of 101
Caño, L., & Sanz, J. (2025) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.70010 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- van Zee, E., & Minstrell, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Maryland, College Park (US)
- Venue
- Journal of the Learning Sciences
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1997-04
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 227-269
- ISSN
- 1050-8406 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7809
- OpenAlex
- W2091292358
- Cited by
- 342
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 19
- FWCI
- 42.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the Learning Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- American Educational Research Association
- University of Washington
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
- Keywords
- teacher questioning, student thinking, physics education, measurement concepts, classroom discourse, teacher beliefs, action plan
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review