Small-Group Reflections: Parallels Between Teacher Discourse and Student Behavior in Peer-Directed Groups
Abstract
Prior research on small-group collaboration identifies several behaviors that significantly predict student learning, such as exchanging explanations and applying help received. Previous reports focus on student behavior to understand why many students do not engage in behaviors predictive of learning, leaving unexplored how teachers may influence small-group interaction. Consequently, this article describes established teacher practices and examines whether and how students reproduce teacher discourse in the context of a semester-long program of cooperative learning in four middle school mathematics classrooms. This article illustrates changes that emerged and factors that made change difficult. The research concludes that student behavior largely mirrored the discourse modeled by and the expectations communicated by teachers. Teachers tended to give unlabeled calculations, procedures, or answers instead of labeled explanations. Teachers often instructed using a recitation approach in which they assumed primary responsibility for solving the problem, having students only provide answers to discrete steps. Finally, teachers rarely encouraged students to verbalize their thinking or to ask questions. Students adopting the role of help-giver showed behavior very similar to that of the teacher: doing most of the work, providing mostly low-level help, and infrequently monitoring other students' level of understanding. The relatively passive behavior of students needing help corres…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
When applying support, students often mirror teachers' behavior or helping style.
“When applying support, students often mirror teachers' behavior or helping style (Gillies, 2011;Jadallah et al., 2011;Webb, Nemer, & Ing, 2006).”
From Scaffolding Student Understanding in Small-Group Work: Students’ Uptake of Teacher Support in Subsequent Small-Group Interaction (2019) · cites this paper as Webb, Nemer, & Ing, 2006
The degree to which students take up teachers' support promotes students' learning as new information is integrated into students' existing knowledge schemes.
“The degree to which students take up teachers' support is known to promote students' learning as new information is integrated into the students' existing knowledge schemes (Webb & Farivar, 1999;Webb, Ing, Kersting, & Nemer, 2006;Wittwer & Renkl, 2008).”
From Scaffolding Student Understanding in Small-Group Work: Students’ Uptake of Teacher Support in Subsequent Small-Group Interaction (2019) · cites this paper as Webb, Ing, Kersting, & Nemer, 2006
Whether students are able to apply and integrate information provided by their teacher into their ongoing work is crucial for student learning.
“Whether students are able to apply and integrate information provided by their teacher into their ongoing work appears to be crucial for student learning (Webb, Nemer, & Ing, 2006;Webb & Farivar, 1999).”
From Scaffolding Student Understanding in Small-Group Work: Students’ Uptake of Teacher Support in Subsequent Small-Group Interaction (2019) · cites this paper as Webb, Nemer, & Ing, 2006
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 110 · Cited by 232
- Authors
- Webb, N. M., Nemer, K. M., & Ing, M.
- Venue
- Journal of the Learning Sciences
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 63-119
- ISSN
- 1050-8406 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7809
- OpenAlex
- W2094223109
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 110
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 25.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the Learning Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
- Keywords
- small group collaboration, teacher discourse, student behavior, cooperative learning, junior high school mathematics, teacher modeling, help-giving, teacher expectations, student engagement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review