Cited by 515Science Education and PedagogyInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsInnovative Teaching Methods

Dialogue in the Classroom

Wells, Gordon, Arauz, Rebeca Mejia·2006·Journal of the Learning Sciences

Abstract

There is increasing agreement among those who study classrooms that learning is likely to be most effective when students are actively involved in the dialogic coconstruction of meaning about topics that are of significance to them. This article reports the results of an extended collaborative action research project in which teachers attempted to create the conditions for such dialogue by adopting an inquiry approach to the curriculum. A quantitative comparison between observations made early and late in the teachers' involvement in the project showed a number of significant changes in the characteristics of teacher–whole-class discourse, with a shift toward a more dialogic mode of interaction. Nevertheless, the initiation-response-follow-up (IRF) genre continued to be pervasive. Despite this, when the same observations were examined qualitatively, there was clear evidence of an increase over time in the teachers' adoption of a "dialogic stance." The article concludes with a consideration of the relationship between the choice of discourse formats and the enactment of a dialogic stance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15327809jls1503_3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Numerous proposals about classroom verbal interaction recur as five themes: open questions, elaboration of previous contributions, reasoned discussion of competing viewpoints, linkage and coordination across contributions, and meta-cognitive engagement with dialogue.

    “Numerous proposals have been made about the characteristics that verbal interaction in classrooms should display in order to optimize student outcomes, but amongst these proposals five themes recur.”
  • Many teachers are already being encouraged through professional development programmes to implement the five themes.

    “through professional development programmes, many teachers are already being encouraged to implement the themes”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 65 · Cited by 515

Authors
Wells, G., & Arauz, R. M.
Affiliations
University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
Venue
Journal of the Learning Sciences
Published
2006-07
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
379-428
ISSN
  • 1050-8406 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7809
OpenAlex
W2049435271
Cited by
515
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 24
FWCI
48.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of the Learning Sciences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
Keywords
classroom dialogue, inquiry-based curriculum, collaborative action research, student engagement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review