Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 255

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Verb-Movement Parameter in Second Language Acquisition

White, Lydia·1990·Language Acquisition

Abstract

This article investigates effects of instruction on parameter resetting in second language acquisition, where the first and second language (French and English, respectively) differ as to the settings they adopt for verb movement (Pollock, 1989). The question addressed is whether instruction on one of a cluster of properties associated with lack of verb movement in English (i.e., question formation) generalizes to another property associated with lack of movement (i.e., adverb placement). A total of 138 francophone learners of English as a second language (ages 10-12) were exposed to two different conditions, being instructed either on English adverb placement or on question formation. Subjects were tested on their knowledge of adverb placement using three different tasks. They were tested prior to instruction, immediately after instruction, and again after a delay of 5 weeks. Results show clear differences between the groups; only the subjects instructed on adverbs came to know the restrictions on adverb placement imposed by lack of verb movement in English. The implications of these results for parameter resetting in L2 acquisition are discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15327817la0104_2

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
White, L.
Venue
Language Acquisition
Published
1990-10
Volume
1
Issue
4
Pages
337-360
ISSN
  • 1048-9223 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7817
OpenAlex
W2038389745
Cited by
255
References
0
FWCI
39.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.