The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Verb-Movement Parameter in Second Language Acquisition
Abstract
This article investigates effects of instruction on parameter resetting in second language acquisition, where the first and second language (French and English, respectively) differ as to the settings they adopt for verb movement (Pollock, 1989). The question addressed is whether instruction on one of a cluster of properties associated with lack of verb movement in English (i.e., question formation) generalizes to another property associated with lack of movement (i.e., adverb placement). A total of 138 francophone learners of English as a second language (ages 10-12) were exposed to two different conditions, being instructed either on English adverb placement or on question formation. Subjects were tested on their knowledge of adverb placement using three different tasks. They were tested prior to instruction, immediately after instruction, and again after a delay of 5 weeks. Results show clear differences between the groups; only the subjects instructed on adverbs came to know the restrictions on adverb placement imposed by lack of verb movement in English. The implications of these results for parameter resetting in L2 acquisition are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
L2 cognitive states and the Full Transfer/Full Access model
Schwartz, B. D., & Sprouse, R. A. (1996) · Second Language Research · doi:10.1177/026765839601200103 · Cited by 1,743
Gradual development of L2 phrase structure
Vainikka, A., & Young-Scholten, M. (1996) · Second Language Research · doi:10.1177/026765839601200102 · Cited by 528
Second language acquisition: Theoretical and experimental issues in contemporary research
Epstein, S. D., Flynn, S., & Martohardjono, G. (1996) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00043521 · Cited by 520
Case and Tense in the ‘fossilized’ steady state
Lardiere, D. (1998) · Second Language Research · doi:10.1191/026765898674105303 · Cited by 472
THE EVOLVING CONTEXT OF THE FUNDAMENTAL DIFFERENCE HYPOTHESIS
Bley-Vroman, R. (2009) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263109090275 · Cited by 335
On the reliability of grammaticality judgement tests in second language acquisition research
Mandell, P. B. (1999) · Second Language Research · doi:10.1191/026765899667538959 · Cited by 91
Reconsidering the Role of Interaction and Input in Second Language Acquisition
Braidi, S. M. (1995) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00965.x · Cited by 27
Chapter 3. From Julie to Wes to Alberto: Revisiting the construct of fossilization
Han, Z. (2014) · Language Learning & Language Teaching · doi:10.1075/lllt.39.05ch3 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- White, L.
- Venue
- Language Acquisition
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1990-10
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 337-360
- ISSN
- 1048-9223 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7817
- OpenAlex
- W2038389745
- Cited by
- 255
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 39.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.