Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 9

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Automation, Task Difficulty, and Aircrew Performance

Bowers, Clint, Thornton, Coleen, Braun, Curt, Morgan, Ben B., Salas, Eduardo·1998·Military Psychology

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15327876mp1004_3

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Blauner R., 1964, Alienation and freedom
  2. Bowers C., 1995, Applications of psychology to the aviation system, 281
  3. Bowers C. A., 1996, Automation and human performance: Theory and applications, 243
  4. 10.3758/BF03203594 · DOI
  5. 10.21236/ADA259514 · DOI
  6. Braune R. J., 1993, Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, 88
  7. Bullinger H. J., 1987, Handbook of human factors, 1657
  8. Clothier C. C., 1991, Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, 332
  9. Costley J., 1989, Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, 413
  10. Curry R. E., 1985, The introduction of new cockpit technology: A human factors study
  11. Czaja S. J., 1987, Handbook of human factors, 1587
  12. 10.4271/821386 · DOI
  13. Goodman P. S., 1984, Applied Social Psychology Annual, 5, 211
  14. Guide P. C., 1993, Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, 849
  15. Harris W. C., 1993, Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, 890a
  16. 10.1177/154193129604000209 · DOI
  17. Laudeman I. V., 1992, Third Annual AS/A Program Investigator's Meeting
  18. 10.4271/821387 · doi:10.4271/821387
  19. Morgan B. B., 1993, Human/Technology Interaction in Complex Systems, 6, 105
  20. Norman S. D., 1988, Flight deck automation: Promises and realities
  21. Prince C., 1992, Teams: Their training and performance, 329
  22. Veinott E. S., 1993, Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, 584
  23. Whyte W. F., 1961, Men at work
  24. Wiener E. L., 1981, Proceedings of the 26th Corporate Aviation Seminar
  25. Wiener E. L., 1989, Human factors of advanced technology (“glass cockpit”) transport aircraft
  26. Wiener E. L., 1993, Cockpit resource management, 199
  27. Wiener E. L., 1991, The impact of cockpit automation on crew coordination and communication: I. Overview, LOFT evaluations, error severity, and questionnaire data
  28. 10.2307/41162162 · doi:10.2307/41162162
  29. 10.1037/h0023997 · DOI

Cited by

See all 9

Metadata

Authors
Bowers, C., Thornton, C., Braun, C., Morgan, B. B., & Salas, E.
Affiliations
  • Department of Psychology, University of Central Florida
  • Department of Psychology, Old Dominion University
  • Naval Air Warfare Center Training Systems Division, Orlando, Florida
Venue
Military Psychology
Published
1998-01
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
259-274
ISSN
  • 0899-5605
  • 1532-7876
Cited by
9
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.