The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluating and Modifying Covariance Structure Models: A Review and Recommendation
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to present a strategy for the evaluation and modification of covariance structure models. The approach makes use of recent developments in estimation under non-standard conditions and unified asymptotic theory related to hypothesis testing. Factors affecting the evaluation and modification of these models are reviewed in terms of nonnormality, missing data, specification error, and sensitivity to large sample size. Alternative model evaluation and specification error search strategies are also reviewed. The approach to covariance structure modeling advocated in this article utilizes the LISREL modification index for assessing statistical power, and the expected parameter change statistic for guiding specification error searches. It is argued that the common approach of utilizing alternative fit indices does not allow the investigator to rule out plausible explanations for model misfit. The approach advocated in this article allows one to determine the extent of sample size sensitivity and the effects of specification error by relying on existing statistical theory underlying covariance structure models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Specification Tests in Econometrics
Hausman, J. A. (1978) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913827 · Cited by 18,820
A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of non‐normal Likert variables
Muthén, B., & Kaplan, D. (1985) · British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8317.1985.tb00832.x · Cited by 1,778
Self-citationOn structural equation modeling with data that are not missing completely at random
Muthén, B., Kaplan, D., & Hollis, M. (1987) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02294365 · Cited by 883
Self-citation
Cited by
Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach
Steiger, J. H. (1990) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4 · Cited by 7,408
Reporting Analyses of Covariance Structures
Boomsma, A. (2000) · Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1207/s15328007sem0703_6 · Cited by 655
Sensation seeking, risk appraisal, and risky behavior
Horvath, P., & Zuckerman, M. (1993) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/0191-8869(93)90173-z · Cited by 604
(2004) · Springer Texts in Statistics · doi:10.1007/b98963 · Cited by 517
Fit Indexes, Lagrange Multipliers, Constraint Changes and Incomplete Data in Structural Models
Bentler, P. M. (1990) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_3 · Cited by 512
Metadata
- Authors
- Kaplan, D.
- Venue
- Multivariate Behavioral Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1990-04
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 137-155
- ISSN
- 0027-3171 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7906
- OpenAlex
- W2070642543
- Cited by
- 249
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 10.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluating and Modifying Covariance Structure Models: A Review and Recommendation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_1
- The paper
- Kaplan, D. (1990). Evaluating and Modifying Covariance Structure Models: A Review and Recommendation. Multivariate Behavioral Research. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.