Cited by 15Nutritional Studies and DietColorectal Cancer Screening and DetectionDietary Effects on Health

Eating Frequency and the Risk of Colon Cancer

Coates, Ashley O., Potter, John D., Caan, Bette J., Edwards, Sandra L., Slattery, Martha L.·2002·Nutrition and Cancer

Abstract

Eating frequency has been found in most previous studies to have a positive association or no association with colon cancer. We report data from a large case-control study to determine the effect of eating frequency on colon cancer risk. Data were analyzed from interviews of 1,966 cases of colon cancer and 2,380 controls from selected areas in Northern California, Utah, and Minnesota. Respondents were asked whether they usually ate or drank something besides water at eight different occasions during the day. We controlled for age, family history of colorectal cancer, body mass index, physical activity, intake of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medication, and dietary intake of energy, fiber, and calcium. In fully adjusted models, we found no significant associations between number of daily eating occasions and colon cancer in women. In men, risk of overall colon cancer was lower for one to two times per day (odds ratio = 0.54, 95% confidence interval = 0.36-0.83) than for three times per day, but risk was not increased for more than three times per day. Compared with three times per day, we found no evidence for an association between colon cancer risk and eating frequencies more than three times per day. The increased risk of colon cancer limited to men eating less than three times per day may be due to uncontrolled confounding.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15327914nc432_1

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Coates, A. O., Potter, J. D., Caan, B. J., Edwards, S. L., & Slattery, M. L.
Affiliations
Kaiser Permanente (US)
Venue
Nutrition and Cancer
Published
2002-07
Volume
43
Issue
2
Pages
121-126
ISSN
  • 0163-5581 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7914
OpenAlex
W2092584246
Cited by
15
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nutrition and Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Kaiser Permanente
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA048998, R01 CA48998)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Dietary Effects on Health
Keywords
meal frequency, colon cancer, colorectal cancer risk, sex differences, dietary habits, confounding
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Colonic Neoplasms, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Time Factors, Confidence Intervals, Odds Ratio, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review