Peace Psychology in Germany.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The responses to the question of "how to prevent a new world war" revealed fundamental differences in people's views on war.
“The responses to the question of “how to prevent a new world war” revealed fundamental differences in people’s views on war (Boehnke et al., 2005).”
From Toward a humanized technology: a reinterpretation of Erich Fromm’ s humanistic peace psychology (2026) · cites this paper as Boehnke et al., 2005
In the 1930s, Fromm conducted an empirical study in Germany to investigate the working class's attitudes towards war.
“In the 1930s, Fromm conducted an empirical study in Germany to investigate the working class’s attitudes towards war.”
From Toward a humanized technology: a reinterpretation of Erich Fromm’ s humanistic peace psychology (2026) · cites this paper as Boehnke et al., 2005
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Toward a humanized technology: a reinterpretation of Erich Fromm’ s humanistic peace psychology
Wang, Y., Li, P., & Liu, W. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1646601 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Boehnke, K., Fuss, D., & Kindervater, A.
- Venue
- Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology
- Published
- 2005-09
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 229-237
- ISSN
- 1078-1919 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7949
- OpenAlex
- W2005285666
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 3.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Peace and Conflict Journal of Peace Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Education for Peace and Conflict Resolution
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Peace and Human Rights Education
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Keywords
- peace psychology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review