Externalizing behavior problems and discipline revisited: Nonlinear effects and variation by culture, context, and gender
Abstract
Debate continues regarding the magnitude and importance ofparenting effects on the development of children's externalizing behavior problems, in spite of the evidence that environments (as well as genes) contribute to individual differences in these behaviors. Research has demonstrated an association between harsh physical discipline and child aggression and conduct problems, a likely causal mechanism that probably operates as a shared environmental factor. We offer four hypotheses about the relation between discipline practices and child externalizing problems that may resolve some debate and help lead toward a more comprehensive understanding of how and when discipline practices will make a substantial difference: 1. The association between discipline and child aggression includes a nonlinear component. 2. The parent behavior-child behavior link varies across cultural groups. 3. Parental discipline effects on children vary according to the context of the broader parent-child relationship. 4. The discipline effect is maximized in same-gender parent-child dyads. Discussion focuses on the role of children's mental representations of discipline experiences as a mediator of discipline effects, and research implications with respect to sampling, measurement, and analytic strategies are noted.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Clinical versus nonclinical youth may differ systematically in average levels of internalizing and externalizing symptoms and in the type and strength of association with certain parenting practices.
“Some scholars argue that there are systematic and qualitative differences between clinically referred versus nonclinical youth, not only in the average level of internalizing and externalizing symptoms, but also in the type and strength of association with certain parenting practices (e.g., Deater-Deckard & Dodge, 1997).”
From Rebels With a Cause? Adolescent Defiance From the Perspective of Reactance Theory and Self-Determination Theory (2015) · cites this paper as Deater-Deckard & Dodge, 1997
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 82 · Cited by 761
- Authors
- Deater-Deckard, K., & Dodge, K. A.
- Venue
- Psychological Inquiry
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1997-07
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 161-175
- ISSN
- 1047-840X (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7965
- OpenAlex
- W2046993924
- Cited by
- 761
- References
- 82
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 43
- FWCI
- 19.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Inquiry (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
- Keywords
- externalizing problems, child aggression, conduct problems, nonlinear effects, cross-cultural variation, gender differences, shared environment, child development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review