The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Reporting and Reacting: Concurrent Responses to Reported Speech
Abstract
This article uses conversation analysis to investigate reported speech in talk-in-interaction. Beginning with an examination of direct and indirect reported speech, it highlights some of the design features of the former, and the sequential environments in which it occurs. Recent research on direct reported speech in interaction has shown that although it purports to be the accurate replaying of a former locution, speakers can simultaneously convey their assessment of the utterance while reproducing it. This investigation focuses on how speakers implicitly comment on a reported utterance, exploring the design and sequential placement of the device within the ongoing talk. It is found that direct reported speech recurs in making complaints and telling amusing stories. In addition, explicit assessment of the reported utterance is made commonly by the recipient in the next turn, and the reporter often collaborates with the recipient's response by producing a similar one in overlap. Thus, participants react concurrently to the reported utterance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Depicting as a method of communication.
Clark, H. H. (2016) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000026 · Cited by 365
Berger, E., & Pekarek Doehler, S. (2018) · Longitudinal Studies on the Organization of Social Interaction · doi:10.1057/978-1-137-57007-9_3 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Holt, E.
- Venue
- Research on Language & Social Interaction
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2000-10
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 425-454
- ISSN
- 0835-1813 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7973
- OpenAlex
- W1990793547
- Cited by
- 357
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reporting and Reacting: Concurrent Responses to Reported Speech. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3304_04
- The paper
- Holt, E. (2000). Reporting and Reacting: Concurrent Responses to Reported Speech. Research on Language & Social Interaction. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3304_04
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.