Cited by 82Reading and Literacy DevelopmentSecond Language Acquisition and LearningEFL/ESL Teaching and Learning

The Implicit and Explicit Learning of Orthographic Structure and Function of a New Writing System

Wang, Min, Liu, Ying, Perfetti, Charles A.·2004·Scientific Studies of Reading

Abstract

Two experiments were carried out to examine how adult readers of English learn to acquire the orthographic structure and function of Chinese characters selected from reading material in their first-semester college course in Chinese. The first experiment, an online lexical decision task, demonstrated that the learners quickly acquired knowledge about the orthographic structure of the characters. With only limited vocabulary and without explicit instruction, they were sensitive to the characters' curriculum frequency and internal compositional features. Overall, these results were consistent with our previous findings (Wang, Perfetti, & Liu, 2003). The second experiment further tested the learners' implicit and explicit learning of the orthographic component function of Chinese characters. In an offline unknown character identification task, these learners showed difficulty in making use of the functional cue of the known semantic radical without any probing. However, with probing they identified visually the majority of target semantic radicals. In addition, they demonstrated implicit knowledge of the meaning cue of the semantic radical by making more appropriate meaning inferences on high-frequency radicals than on low-frequency ones. After receiving explicit instruction, the students extracted significantly more meaning information from known semantic radicals, particularly low-frequency ones, compared to their performance prior to such instruction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s1532799xssr0804_3

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, M., Liu, Y., & Perfetti, C. A.
Venue
Scientific Studies of Reading
Published
2004-10
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
357-379
ISSN
  • 1088-8438 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-799X
OpenAlex
W1963811932
Cited by
82
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Scientific Studies of Reading (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Academy of Education
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Keywords
Chinese character learning, orthographic structure, semantic radicals, implicit learning, explicit instruction, lexical decision, character frequencies, compositional features, second language reading

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review