The Implicit and Explicit Learning of Orthographic Structure and Function of a New Writing System
Abstract
Two experiments were carried out to examine how adult readers of English learn to acquire the orthographic structure and function of Chinese characters selected from reading material in their first-semester college course in Chinese. The first experiment, an online lexical decision task, demonstrated that the learners quickly acquired knowledge about the orthographic structure of the characters. With only limited vocabulary and without explicit instruction, they were sensitive to the characters' curriculum frequency and internal compositional features. Overall, these results were consistent with our previous findings (Wang, Perfetti, & Liu, 2003). The second experiment further tested the learners' implicit and explicit learning of the orthographic component function of Chinese characters. In an offline unknown character identification task, these learners showed difficulty in making use of the functional cue of the known semantic radical without any probing. However, with probing they identified visually the majority of target semantic radicals. In addition, they demonstrated implicit knowledge of the meaning cue of the semantic radical by making more appropriate meaning inferences on high-frequency radicals than on low-frequency ones. After receiving explicit instruction, the students extracted significantly more meaning information from known semantic radicals, particularly low-frequency ones, compared to their performance prior to such instruction.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A short instruction to focus on the semantic radical brings improvement that is dramatic and immediate.
“and that a short instruction to focus on the semantic radical brings improvement that is dramatic and immediate (Wang, Liu, & Perfetti, C. A., 2004).”
From The Knowledge‐Learning‐Instruction Framework: Bridging the Science‐Practice Chasm to Enhance Robust Student Learning (2012) · cites this paper as Wang, Liu, & Perfetti, C. A., 2004
Cites
Ellis, N. C. (2002) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263102002024 · Cited by 2,230 · cited 1× · see citing works
“These researchers argued that explicit second-language instruction can result in significant target-oriented gains and that the effectiveness of second-language instruction is long lasting (DeKeyser, 1997; MacWhinney, 1997; see Ellis, 2002, for a detailed review).”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Koedinger, K. R., Corbett, A. T., & Perfetti, C. (2012) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2012.01245.x · Cited by 772 · see citing works
Self-citationDavis, L. M., Michaelides, M., Cheskin, L. J., Moran, T. H., Aja, S., Watkins, P. A., Pei, Z., Contoreggi, C., McCullough, K., Hope, B., et al. (2009) · Neuroendocrinology · doi:10.1159/000170586 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wang, M., Liu, Y., & Perfetti, C. A.
- Venue
- Scientific Studies of Reading
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2004-10
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 357-379
- ISSN
- 1088-8438 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-799X
- OpenAlex
- W1963811932
- Cited by
- 82
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 3.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Scientific Studies of Reading (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- National Academy of Education
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Keywords
- Chinese character learning, orthographic structure, semantic radicals, implicit learning, explicit instruction, lexical decision, character frequencies, compositional features, second language reading
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review