Cited by 58Innovations in Medical EducationInclusion and Disability in Education and SportEmpathy and Medical Education

DEVELOPMENTS: Effects of a Disability Awareness and Skills Training Workshop on Senior Medical Students as Assessed with Self Ratings and Performance on a Standardized Patient Case

Saketkoo, Lesley, Anderson, Delia, Rice, Janet, Rogan, Ama, Lazarus, Cathy J.·2004·Teaching and Learning in Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: People with disabilities compose one of the largest and fastest growing subgroups of the U.S. population. Disability and rehabilitation issues are not well covered in most North American medical school curricula. This article describes the development and assessment of a 3-hr workshop for medical students on disability skills and awareness. DESCRIPTION: Fourth-year medical students on a required clerkship participated in the workshop on alternate months. The efficacy of the intervention was measured by a comparison between the participant and control students using a pretest and posttest self-efficacy questionnaire and a one-station Standardized Patient (SP) Clinical Case depicting a hemiplegic patient and a caregiver. EVALUATION: Factor analysis of the survey yielded 4 subscales: Attitude, Advocacy, Interaction, Obtaining Services. There was a significant difference between the treatment and control group on the advocacy scale and on the SP communication and interstation exercises. CONCLUSION: A targeted educational intervention can have a positive effect on medical students' knowledge, skills, and attitudes toward patients with disabilities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15328015tlm1604_7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 14 · Cited by 58

Authors
Saketkoo, L., Anderson, D., Rice, J., Rogan, A., & Lazarus, C. J.
Affiliations
Tulane University (US)
Venue
Teaching and Learning in Medicine
Published
2004-10
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
345-354
ISSN
  • 1040-1334 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-8015
OpenAlex
W2086072620
Cited by
58
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Teaching and Learning in Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Empathy and Medical Education
Keywords
disability awareness, medical students, self-efficacy, standardized patients, hemiplegia, caregiver communication, patient advocacy, attitudes toward disability, medical education intervention
MeSH terms
Attitude, Clinical Competence, Disability Evaluation, Education, Medical, Undergraduate, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Patient Advocacy, Physician-Patient Relations, Surveys and Questionnaires, Students, Medical, Time Factors, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review