DEVELOPMENTS: Effects of a Disability Awareness and Skills Training Workshop on Senior Medical Students as Assessed with Self Ratings and Performance on a Standardized Patient Case
Abstract
BACKGROUND: People with disabilities compose one of the largest and fastest growing subgroups of the U.S. population. Disability and rehabilitation issues are not well covered in most North American medical school curricula. This article describes the development and assessment of a 3-hr workshop for medical students on disability skills and awareness. DESCRIPTION: Fourth-year medical students on a required clerkship participated in the workshop on alternate months. The efficacy of the intervention was measured by a comparison between the participant and control students using a pretest and posttest self-efficacy questionnaire and a one-station Standardized Patient (SP) Clinical Case depicting a hemiplegic patient and a caregiver. EVALUATION: Factor analysis of the survey yielded 4 subscales: Attitude, Advocacy, Interaction, Obtaining Services. There was a significant difference between the treatment and control group on the advocacy scale and on the SP communication and interstation exercises. CONCLUSION: A targeted educational intervention can have a positive effect on medical students' knowledge, skills, and attitudes toward patients with disabilities.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A pretest and post-test showed that awareness of the impact of physician advocacy increased significantly with the Saketkoo et al programme.
“A pretest and post-test showed that this awareness increased significantly with the programme.”
From Role of active patient involvement in undergraduate medical education: a systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as [63]
Reported financial cost of $800 for a disability skills workshop.
“Reported financial costs included $800 for a disability skills workshop,63”
From Role of active patient involvement in undergraduate medical education: a systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as [63]
The incorporation of initiatives as ongoing modules in the curriculum achieved sustainable patient involvement rather than sporadic involvement.
“The incorporation of initiatives as ongoing modules in the curriculum achieved sustainable patient involvement rather than sporadic involvement.53 63”
From Role of active patient involvement in undergraduate medical education: a systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as [63]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 14 · Cited by 58
- Authors
- Saketkoo, L., Anderson, D., Rice, J., Rogan, A., & Lazarus, C. J.
- Affiliations
- Tulane University (US)
- ORCID
- Saketkoo, Lesley
- Venue
- Teaching and Learning in Medicine
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2004-10
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 345-354
- ISSN
- 1040-1334 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-8015
- OpenAlex
- W2086072620
- Cited by
- 58
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Teaching and Learning in Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Empathy and Medical Education
- Keywords
- disability awareness, medical students, self-efficacy, standardized patients, hemiplegia, caregiver communication, patient advocacy, attitudes toward disability, medical education intervention
- MeSH terms
- Attitude, Clinical Competence, Disability Evaluation, Education, Medical, Undergraduate, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Patient Advocacy, Physician-Patient Relations, Surveys and Questionnaires, Students, Medical, Time Factors, United States
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review