CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 223Innovative Teaching MethodsMemory Processes and InfluencesEvaluation of Teaching Practices

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Exam-A-Day Procedure Improves Performance in Psychology Classes

Leeming, Frank C.·2002·Teaching of Psychology
DOI 10.1207/s15328023top2903_06
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Students in 4 classes had a short exam at the start of every class. Grades were significantly better than in previous classes where the same material was taught but with only 4 exams, and there were fewer withdrawals from the exam-a-day classes. Students taught with the exam-a-day procedure also performed better on a retention test than did students from classes taught using less frequent exams. Responses to anonymous questionnaires administered in all 4 classes indicated that most students believed having an exam every day led to more studying and better learning than in their other classes and that they liked the procedure.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15328023top2903_06

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Shadish W., 1997, Effect size (ES) analysis software (Version 1.0) [Computer software]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 223

Related

Metadata

Authors
Leeming, F. C.
Affiliations
University of Memphis (US)
Corresponding author
Leeming, Frank C.
Venue
Teaching of Psychology
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2002-07
Volume
29
Issue
3
Pages
210-212
ISSN
  • 0098-6283 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-8023
DOI
10.1207/s15328023top2903_06
OpenAlex
W2108499824
Cited by
222
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 12
FWCI
2.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
Teaching of Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
Keywords
psychology course, student performance, student retention, student withdrawal, student perceptions, study habits

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review