A Manifesto on Psychology as Idiographic Science: Bringing the Person Back Into Scientific Psychology, This Time Forever
Abstract
Psychology is focused on variation between cases (interindividual variation). Results thus obtained are considered to be generalizable to the understanding and explanation of variation within single cases (intraindividual variation). It is indicated, however, that the direct consequences of the classical ergodic theorems for psychology and psychometrics invalidate this conjectured generalizability: only under very strict conditions-which are hardly obtained in real psychological processes-can a generalization be made from a structure of interindividual variation to the analogous structure of intraindividual variation. Illustrations of the lack of this generalizability are given in the contexts of psychometrics, developmental psychology, and personality theory.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
SCEDs provide evidence of the effectiveness of interventions, drawing on substantially fewer participants than nomothetic approaches such as RCTs.
“In doing this, SCEDs provide evidence of the effectiveness of interventions, drawing on substantially fewer participants than nomothetic approaches (such as RCTs) [51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58].”
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 53 · Cited by 1,943
- Authors
- Molenaar, P. C. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Amsterdam (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Molenaar, Peter C. M.
- Venue
- Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research & Perspective
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2004-10
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 201-218
- ISSN
- 1536-6359 (ISSN-L)
- 1536-6367
- OpenAlex
- W2123330495
- Cited by
- 1,943
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2026: 92 · 2025: 123 · 2024: 163 · 2023: 157 · 2022: 152 · 2021: 160 · 2020: 163 · 2019: 144 · 2018: 105 · 2017: 102 · 2016: 93 · 2015: 99 · 2014: 66 · 2013: 56 · 2012: 43
- FWCI
- 90.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Measurement Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives (publishedVersion)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › General Psychology › Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
- Keywords
- interindividual variability, within-person variability, generalizability, ergodic theorem, psychometrics, developmental psychology, personality theory, person-centered approach
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review