The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Buffering children from marital conflict and dissolution
Abstract
Examined several protective mechanisms that may reduce deleterious correlates of marital conflict and marital dissolution in young children. One set of potential buffers focused on parent-child interaction: parental warmth, parental scaffolding/praise, and inhibition of parental rejection. As a second set of potential buffers, each parent was interviewed about their "meta-emotion philosophy"--that is, their feelings about their own emotions, and their attitudes and responses to their children's anger and sadness. The third set of potential buffers concerned intraindividual characteristics of the child, including the child's intelligence and regulatory physiology (basal vagal tone and vagal suppression). Fifty-six families with a preschool child were studied at two time points: when the children were 5 years old (Time 1) and again when the children were 8 years old (Time 2). At Time 1, naturalistic observations of marital and parent-child interaction were conducted and assessment of child regulatory physiology was obtained through measures of basal vagal tone and suppression of vagal tone. Parents were also interviewed individually about their feelings about their own and their children's emotions, and children's intelligence was assessed. At Time 2, assessment of child outcomes were obtained, including observations of peer interaction, mother ratings of behavior problems and mother and teacher ratings of peer aggression, mother ratings of child physical illness, and measures of achievement. Results indicated that all Time 1 buffering factors protected children in face of marital conflict and dissolution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
PORGES, S. W. (1995) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1995.tb01213.x · Cited by 1,624
Psychosocial and behavioral predictors of longevity: The aging and death of the ‘Termites’.
Friedman, H. S., Tucker, J. S., Schwartz, J. E., Tomlinson-Keasey, C., Martin, L. R., Wingard, D. L., & Criqui, M. H. (1995) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.50.2.69 · Cited by 271
Cited by
Crowell, S. E., Beauchaine, T. P., & Linehan, M. M. (2009) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0015616 · Cited by 1,292
The Effects of Family and Community Violence on Children
Margolin, G., & Gordis, E. B. (2000) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.445 · Cited by 1,252
Cummings, E. M., & Davies, P. T. (2002) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/1469-7610.00003 · Cited by 891
Beauchaine, T. P., Gatzke-Kopp, L., & Mead, H. K. (2007) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2005.08.008 · Cited by 722
Sharp, C., & Fonagy, P. (2008) · Social Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2007.00457.x · Cited by 480
Metadata
- Authors
- Katz, L. F., & Gottman, J. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Child Psychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1997-06
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 157-171
- ISSN
- 0047-228X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2051034153
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Buffering children from marital conflict and dissolution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1207/s15374424jccp2602_4
- The paper
- Katz, L. F., & Gottman, J. M. (1997). Buffering children from marital conflict and dissolution. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15374424jccp2602_4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.