Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 280

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Situated Action: A Neuropsychological Interpretation Response to Vera and Simon

Open access
Clancey, William J.·1993·Cognitive Science

Abstract

The most fundamental contribution so far of artificial intelligence and com‐puter science to the joint enterprise of cognitive science has been the notion of a physical symbol system, i.e.,… systems capable of having and manipulating symbols, yet realizable in the physical universe.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15516709cog1701_7

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 280

Metadata

Authors
Clancey, W. J.
Venue
Cognitive Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1993-01
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
87-116
ISSN
  • 0364-0213 (ISSN-L)
  • 1551-6709
OpenAlex
W2011422262
Cited by
280
References
5
FWCI
8.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Situated Action: A Neuropsychological Interpretation Response to Vera and Simon. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1207/s15516709cog1701_7
The paper
Clancey, W. J. (1993). Situated Action: A Neuropsychological Interpretation Response to Vera and Simon. Cognitive Science. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1701_7

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.