Cultivating Students' Discipline-Specific Dispositions as a Critical Goal for Pedagogy and Equity
Abstract
In this article, we argue that conceptions of content should be broadened beyond the ideas, skills, and proficiencies of particular subject matter disciplines. We frame mathematics teaching as a paradigm case in which to argue that a focus on pedagogy should also include an explicit concern for the kinds of dispositions that students are developing towards a particular discipline as they engage in (or oppose) classroom instructional activities. Our purpose in developing this perspective is to focus on students' access to discipline-specific literacies wherein all students have an opportunity to participate legitimately in classroom practices that lead to competence in the short term and to continued engagement in the discipline in the long term.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The implementation structure of the growing-visual-patterns task allowed for the delegation of authority from the instructor to the PSTs in ways advocated by research.
“This implementation structure allowed for the delegation of authority from the instructor to the PSTs in the ways advocated by research in the field (Dunleavy, 2015; Gresalfi & Cobb, 2006; Stein & Smith, 2008; Webel, 2010).”
From Exercising Mathematical Authority: Three Cases of Preservice Teachers’ Algebraic Justifications (2019) · cites this paper as Gresalfi & Cobb, 2006
Cites
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815355 · Cited by 33,219 · see citing works
Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform
Shulman, L. (1987) · Harvard Educational Review · doi:10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411 · Cited by 16,787 · see citing works
Black students' school success: Coping with the ?burden of ?acting white??
Fordham, S., & Ogbu, J. U. (1986) · The Urban Review · doi:10.1007/bf01112192 · Cited by 3,323 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Exercising Mathematical Authority: Three Cases of Preservice Teachers’ Algebraic Justifications
Prasad, P. V., & Barron, V. J. (2019) · The Mathematics Educator · doi:10.63301/tme.v28i2.2050 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“This implementation structure allowed for the delegation of authority from the instructor to the PSTs in the ways advocated by research in the field (Dunleavy, 2015; Gresalfi & Cobb, 2006; Stein & Smith, 2008; Webel, 2010).”
BackgroundMethod
- Authors
- Gresalfi, M. S., & Cobb, P.
- Venue
- Pedagogies: An International Journal
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 49-57
- ISSN
- 1554-480X (ISSN-L)
- 1554-4818
- OpenAlex
- W1986464440
- Cited by
- 143
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 20.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Pedagogies An International Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Keywords
- mathematics education, pedagogy, educational equity, student engagement, student competencies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review