The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Individual Differences in Response to Early Interventions in Reading: The Lingering Problem of Treatment Resisters
Abstract
The goal of many recent intervention studies has been to examine the conditions that must be in place for all children to acquire adequate reading skills. Although the ultimate goal of reading instruction is to help children acquire the skills necessary to comprehend text, an important subgoal for early reading instruction is to teach children to identify words accurately on the printed page. Five recent studies of methods to prevent reading difficulties were examined in light of the goal that every child should acquire adequate word reading skills during early elementary school. It was estimated that our best current methods, if applied broadly, would leave anywhere from 2% to 6% of children with inadequate word reading skills in the first and second grades. Several broad characteristics of these treatment resisters are identified, and the implications of these findings for future research are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hoover, W. A., & Gough, P. B. (1990) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/bf00401799 · Cited by 2,956
Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., Rashotte, C. A., Hecht, S. A., Barker, T. A., Burgess, S. R., Donahue, J., & Garon, T. (1997) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.33.3.468 · Cited by 1,077
Self-citation
Cited by
Lyon, G. R., Shaywitz, S. E., & Shaywitz, B. A. (2003) · Annals of Dyslexia · doi:10.1007/s11881-003-0001-9 · Cited by 1,914
Developmental Dyslexia and Specific Language Impairment: Same or Different?
Bishop, D. V. M., & Snowling, M. J. (2004) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.6.858 · Cited by 1,356
The Prevention of Reading Difficulties
Torgesen, J. K. (2002) · Journal of School Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0022-4405(01)00092-9 · Cited by 580
Self-citationImproving language and literacy is a matter of time
Tallal, P. (2004) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1499 · Cited by 488
What We Need to Know About Responsiveness To Intervention (and Shouldn't Be Afraid to Ask)
Fuchs, D., & Deshler, D. D. (2007) · Learning Disabilities Research & Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2007.00237.x · Cited by 316
Metadata
- Authors
- Torgesen, J. K.
- Venue
- Learning Disabilities Research and Practice
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2000-03
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 55-64
- ISSN
- 0938-8982 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2032608535
- Cited by
- 785
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 35.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Individual Differences in Response to Early Interventions in Reading: The Lingering Problem of Treatment Resisters. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1207/sldrp1501_6
- The paper
- Torgesen, J. K. (2000). Individual Differences in Response to Early Interventions in Reading: The Lingering Problem of Treatment Resisters. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1207/sldrp1501_6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.