Cited by 676Barrier Structure and Function StudiesDrug Transport and Resistance MechanismsNanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery

CNS Delivery Via Adsorptive Transcytosis

Open access
Hervé, Françoise, Ghinea, Nicolae, Scherrmann, Jean-Michel·2008·The AAPS Journal

Abstract

Adsorptive-mediated transcytosis (AMT) provides a means for brain delivery of medicines across the blood-brain barrier (BBB). The BBB is readily equipped for the AMT process: it provides both the potential for binding and uptake of cationic molecules to the luminal surface of endothelial cells, and then for exocytosis at the abluminal surface. The transcytotic pathways present at the BBB and its morphological and enzymatic properties provide the means for movement of the molecules through the endothelial cytoplasm. AMT-based drug delivery to the brain was performed using cationic proteins and cell-penetrating peptides (CPPs). Protein cationization using either synthetic or natural polyamines is discussed and some examples of diamine/polyamine modified proteins that cross BBB are described. Two main families of CPPs belonging to the Tat-derived peptides and Syn-B vectors have been extensively used in CPP vector-mediated strategies allowing delivery of a large variety of small molecules as well as proteins across cell membranes in vitro and the BBB in vivo. CPP strategy suffers from several limitations such as toxicity and immunogenicity--like the cationization strategy--as well as the instability of peptide vectors in biological media. The review concludes by stressing the need to improve the understanding of AMT mechanisms at BBB and the effectiveness of cationized proteins and CPP-vectorized proteins as neurotherapeutics.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1208/s12248-008-9055-2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 135 · Cited by 676

Authors
Hervé, F., Ghinea, N., & Scherrmann, J.-M.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Inserm (FR)
Corresponding author
Hervé, Françoise
Venue
The AAPS Journal
Published
2008-08-26
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
455-472
ISSN
1550-7416 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2036821782
Cited by
676
References
135
Citations by year
2026: 44 · 2025: 66 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 61 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 19
FWCI
0.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The AAPS Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
Keywords
blood-brain barrier, brain drug delivery, cell-penetrating peptides, cationic proteins, transcytosis, neurotherapeutics
MeSH terms
Adsorption, Animals, Biological Transport, Blood-Brain Barrier, Cations, Pharmaceutical Preparations, Endocytosis, Humans, Peptides, Proteins, Drug Delivery Systems, Endothelial Cells, Electrophysiological Phenomena

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review