Cited by 80Drug Solubulity and Delivery SystemsAdvanced Drug Delivery SystemsPharmaceutical studies and practices

Role of Physiological Intestinal Water in Oral Absorption

Open access
Sutton, Steven C.·2009·The AAPS Journal

Abstract

Water volume has impact when the compound has low aqueous solubility. For example, the absorption of compounds with a Biopharmaceutics Classification System class 2 or 4 is likely to be solubility-limited. Provided the formulation does not contribute to a dissolution-limited condition (e.g., particle size, Waterman and Sutton, J Control Release 86:293-304, 2003) and permeability is rapid, any impact on solubility factors in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract will directly impact the fraction absorbed These factors are in situ solubility, precipitation, and volume of water. Using GastroPlus, models were developed with literature values of water volume in the small (SIWV) and large (LIWV) intestines for several solubility limited compounds. One or more models were developed for the mean plasma concentration-time profile of each compound. The consistency of the models with known literature and experimental data for the compounds' solubility and precipitation was determined. The SIWV associated with best fits of solubility limited compounds averaged about 130 ml, with a range of 10-150 ml in the fasted state. The average LIWV in the fasted state was about 10 ml and ranged as large as 125 ml. The wide range of individual LIWV values is likely due to variability in pharmacokinetics, permeability, GI transit, and the observation that data set was collected during a "snapshot in time". The preferred values of 10% organ volume for small intestine and 1-10% organ volume for large intestine are recommended in lieu of the GastroPlus default values of 40% and 10%, respectively.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1208/s12248-009-9087-2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 32 · Cited by 80

Authors
Sutton, S. C.
Affiliations
Pfizer (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Sutton, Steven C.
Venue
The AAPS Journal
Published
2009-05-02
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
277-285
ISSN
1550-7416 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2037829106
Cited by
80
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The AAPS Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Pfizer
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
Keywords
oral absorption, Biopharmaceutics Classification System, small intestine, large intestine, precipitation chemistry, GastroPlus, plasma concentration-time curve, pharmacokinetic modeling, fasting state
MeSH terms
Animals, Biopharmaceutics, Body Water, Pharmaceutical Preparations, Humans, Intestinal Absorption, Intestinal Mucosa, Intestine, Large, Intestine, Small, Intestines, Models, Biological, Permeability, Pharmacokinetics, Solubility

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review