Cited by 285Computational Drug Discovery MethodsPharmaceutical Economics and PolicyPharmaceutical studies and practices

Drug repurposing: far beyond new targets for old drugs

Open access
Oprea, T. I., Mestres, J.·2012·The AAPS Journal

Abstract

Repurposing drugs requires finding novel therapeutic indications compared to the ones for which they were already approved. This is an increasingly utilized strategy for finding novel medicines, one that capitalizes on previous investments while derisking clinical activities. This approach is of interest primarily because we continue to face significant gaps in the drug-target interactions matrix and to accumulate safety and efficacy data during clinical studies. Collecting and making publicly available as much data as possible on the target profile of drugs offer opportunities for drug repurposing, but may limit the commercial applications by patent applications. Certain clinical applications may be more feasible for repurposing than others because of marked differences in side effect tolerance. Other factors that ought to be considered when assessing drug repurposing opportunities include relevance to the disease in question and the intellectual property landscape. These activities go far beyond the identification of new targets for old drugs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1208/s12248-012-9390-1

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Leading candidate repositionable drugs are already approved or have been through several stages of clinical development, so their pharmacological properties and safety in humans are already established.

    “One of the distinct advantages of repurposing is the fact that the leading candidate repositionable drugs are already approved or at the very least have been through several stages of clinical development, and therefore the pharmacological properties of these drugs, and their safety in humans are already established [63,64].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 37 · Cited by 285

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Oprea TI. Sense and nonsense in drug discovery: a chemical perspective. In: Kruse CG, Timmerman H, editors. Towards drugs of the future. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2008. p. 29-36.
  2. Merck & Co., Inc. Merck announces voluntary worldwide withdrawal of Vioxx® (press release) Whitehouse Station, NJ; 2004 Sep 30.
  3. Wermuth CG. The 'SOSA' approach: an alternative to high- throughput screening. Med Chem Res. 2001;10:431-9.
  4. Curley D, Easey A. Drug repurposing and repatenting. Bio- Science Law Review. 2009;10:131-4.

Authors
Oprea, T. I., & Mestres, J.
Affiliations
  • University of New Mexico (US)
  • Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES)
Corresponding author
Oprea, T. I.
Venue
The AAPS Journal
Published
2012-07-24
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
759-763
ISSN
1550-7416 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1987730034
Cited by
285
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 3
FWCI
12.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • The AAPS Journal (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Instituto de Salud Carlos III
  • National Institute of Mental Health (U54MH084690)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R21GM095952)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
Keywords
drug repurposing, drug-target interactions, target profiles, patent applications, intellectual property
MeSH terms
Clinical Trials as Topic, Pharmaceutical Preparations, Humans, Patents as Topic, Drug Design, Drug Approval, Intellectual Property, Drug Repositioning, Molecular Targeted Therapy, Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review