Drug repurposing: far beyond new targets for old drugs
Open accessAbstract
Repurposing drugs requires finding novel therapeutic indications compared to the ones for which they were already approved. This is an increasingly utilized strategy for finding novel medicines, one that capitalizes on previous investments while derisking clinical activities. This approach is of interest primarily because we continue to face significant gaps in the drug-target interactions matrix and to accumulate safety and efficacy data during clinical studies. Collecting and making publicly available as much data as possible on the target profile of drugs offer opportunities for drug repurposing, but may limit the commercial applications by patent applications. Certain clinical applications may be more feasible for repurposing than others because of marked differences in side effect tolerance. Other factors that ought to be considered when assessing drug repurposing opportunities include relevance to the disease in question and the intellectual property landscape. These activities go far beyond the identification of new targets for old drugs.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Leading candidate repositionable drugs are already approved or have been through several stages of clinical development, so their pharmacological properties and safety in humans are already established.
“One of the distinct advantages of repurposing is the fact that the leading candidate repositionable drugs are already approved or at the very least have been through several stages of clinical development, and therefore the pharmacological properties of these drugs, and their safety in humans are already established [63,64].”
From Antifungal therapy of Candida biofilms: Past, present and future (2023) · cites this paper as [64]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 37 · Cited by 285
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Oprea TI. Sense and nonsense in drug discovery: a chemical perspective. In: Kruse CG, Timmerman H, editors. Towards drugs of the future. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2008. p. 29-36.
- Merck & Co., Inc. Merck announces voluntary worldwide withdrawal of Vioxx® (press release) Whitehouse Station, NJ; 2004 Sep 30.
- Wermuth CG. The 'SOSA' approach: an alternative to high- throughput screening. Med Chem Res. 2001;10:431-9.
- Curley D, Easey A. Drug repurposing and repatenting. Bio- Science Law Review. 2009;10:131-4.
- Authors
- Oprea, T. I., & Mestres, J.
- Affiliations
- University of New Mexico (US)
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Oprea, T. I.
- Venue
- The AAPS Journal
- Published
- 2012-07-24
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 759-763
- ISSN
- 1550-7416 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3475856
- OpenAlex
- W1987730034
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 12.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- public-domain
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- The AAPS Journal (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- Instituto de Salud Carlos III
- National Institute of Mental Health (U54MH084690)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R21GM095952)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
- Keywords
- drug repurposing, drug-target interactions, target profiles, patent applications, intellectual property
- MeSH terms
- Clinical Trials as Topic, Pharmaceutical Preparations, Humans, Patents as Topic, Drug Design, Drug Approval, Intellectual Property, Drug Repositioning, Molecular Targeted Therapy, Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review