Cited by 54Statistical Methods in Clinical TrialsComputational Drug Discovery MethodsPharmaceutical studies and practices

QSP toolbox: computational implementation of integrated workflow components for deploying multi-scale mechanistic models.

Open access
Cheng, Yougan, Thalhauser, Craig J., Smithline, Shepard, Pagidala, Jyotsna, Miladinov, Marko, Vezina, Heather E., Gupta, Manish, Leil, Tarek A. +1 more·2017·The AAPS Journal

Abstract

Quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) modeling has become increasingly important in pharmaceutical research and development, and is a powerful tool to gain mechanistic insights into the complex dynamics of biological systems in response to drug treatment. However, even once a suitable mathematical framework to describe the pathophysiology and mechanisms of interest is established, final model calibration and the exploration of variability can be challenging and time consuming. QSP models are often formulated as multi-scale, multi-compartment nonlinear systems of ordinary differential equations. Commonly accepted modeling strategies, workflows, and tools have promise to greatly improve the efficiency of QSP methods and improve productivity. In this paper, we present the QSP Toolbox, a set of functions, structure array conventions, and class definitions that computationally implement critical elements of QSP workflows including data integration, model calibration, and variability exploration. We present the application of the toolbox to an ordinary differential equations-based model for antibody drug conjugates. As opposed to a single stepwise reference model calibration, the toolbox also facilitates simultaneous parameter optimization and variation across multiple in vitro, in vivo, and clinical assays to more comprehensively generate alternate mechanistic hypotheses that are in quantitative agreement with available data. The toolbox also includes scripts for developing and applying virtual populations to mechanistic exploration of biomarkers and efficacy. We anticipate that the QSP Toolbox will be a useful resource that will facilitate implementation, evaluation, and sharing of new methodologies in a common framework that will greatly benefit the community.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1208/s12248-017-0100-x

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 63 · Cited by 54

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Sorger PK, Allerheiligen SR, Abernethy DR, Altman RB, Brouwer KL, Califano A, et al., editors. Quantitative and systems pharmacology in the post-genomic era: new approaches to discovering drugs and understanding therapeutic mechanisms. An NIH white paper by the QSP workshop group; 2011: NIH Bethesda.
  2. Thalhauser CJ, Schmidt BJ, Miladinov M, Leil TA. Mechanistic predictions of response to combinations of biologic agents in a quantitative systems pharmacology model of rheumatoid arthri- tis. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2015;42:S38-S9.
  3. Schmidt BJ, Vezina HE, Gupta M, Leil TA. Development of a quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) platform to support translational research and clinical development of affinity drug conjugates (ADCs). J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2015;42:S66-S7.
  4. Cheng Y, Vezina HE, Gupta M, Pan C, Leil TA, Schmidt BJ. Development of a Quantitative Systems Pharmacology (QSP) Toolbox and Virtual Population (VPop) for Affinity-Drug Conjugate (ADC) Research. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2016;43:S47.
  5. Block M, Burghaus R, Dickschen K, Gaub T, Kupfer L, Lippert J. Physiologically-based PK/PD modeling for oncology: applica- tions for antibody drug conjugates. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2014;41(1):S58-S9.
  6. Li L, Rose R, Machavaram K, Gardner I, Jamei M. Evaluating the efficiency of payload delivery by ADCs using a minimal PBPK model. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2015;42:S22.

Authors
Cheng, Y., Thalhauser, C. J., Smithline, S., Pagidala, J., Miladinov, M., Vezina, H. E., Gupta, M., Leil, T. A., & Schmidt, B. J.
Affiliations
Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Schmidt, Brian J.
Venue
The AAPS Journal
Published
2017-05-24
Volume
19
Issue
4
Pages
1002-1016
ISSN
1550-7416 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2619951286
Cited by
54
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3
FWCI
3.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The AAPS Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
Keywords
quantitative systems pharmacology, ordinary differential equations, model calibration, parameter optimization, antibody-drug conjugates, virtual population, efficacy prediction, data integration, software toolbox
MeSH terms
Calibration, Computer Simulation, Models, Theoretical, Immunoconjugates, Workflow

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review