Cited by 30Gastrointestinal motility and disordersDrug Solubulity and Delivery SystemsNMR spectroscopy and applications

Mechanistic Fluid Transport Model to Estimate Gastrointestinal Fluid Volume and Its Dynamic Change Over Time

Open access
Yu, Alex, Jackson, Trachette, Tsume, Yasuhiro, Koenigsknecht, Mark, Wysocki, Jeffrey, Marciani, Luca, Amidon, Gordon L., Frances, Ann +5 more·2017·The AAPS Journal

Abstract

Gastrointestinal (GI) fluid volume and its dynamic change are integral to study drug disintegration, dissolution, transit, and absorption. However, key questions regarding the local volume and its absorption, secretion, and transit remain unanswered. The dynamic fluid compartment absorption and transit (DFCAT) model is proposed to estimate in vivo GI volume and GI fluid transport based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) quantified fluid volume. The model was validated using GI local concentration of phenol red in human GI tract, which was directly measured by human GI intubation study after oral dosing of non-absorbable phenol red. The measured local GI concentration of phenol red ranged from 0.05 to 168 μg/mL (stomach), to 563 μg/mL (duodenum), to 202 μg/mL (proximal jejunum), and to 478 μg/mL (distal jejunum). The DFCAT model characterized observed MRI fluid volume and its dynamic changes from 275 to 46.5 mL in stomach (from 0 to 30 min) with mucus layer volume of 40 mL. The volumes of the 30 small intestine compartments were characterized by a max of 14.98 mL to a min of 0.26 mL (0-120 min) and a mucus layer volume of 5 mL per compartment. Regional fluid volumes over 0 to 120 min ranged from 5.6 to 20.38 mL in the proximal small intestine, 36.4 to 44.08 mL in distal small intestine, and from 42 to 64.46 mL in total small intestine. The DFCAT model can be applied to predict drug dissolution and absorption in the human GI tract with future improvements.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1208/s12248-017-0145-x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 27 · Cited by 30

Authors
Yu, A., Jackson, T., Tsume, Y., Koenigsknecht, M., Wysocki, J., Marciani, L., Amidon, G. L., Frances, A., Baker, J. R., Hasler, W., Wen, B., Pai, A., & Sun, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
Corresponding author
Sun, Duxin
Venue
The AAPS Journal
Published
2017-10-04
Volume
19
Issue
6
Pages
1682-1690
ISSN
1550-7416 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2761490890
Cited by
30
References
27
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4
FWCI
3.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The AAPS Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › NMR spectroscopy and applications
Keywords
fluid transport, phenol red, drug absorption, drug dissolution
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Gastric Emptying, Gastrointestinal Transit, Humans, Intestinal Absorption, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Phenolsulfonphthalein, Drug Liberation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review