Multi-Well Array Culture of Primary Human Hepatocyte Spheroids for Clearance Extrapolation of Slowly Metabolized Compounds
Abstract
Accurate prediction of human pharmacokinetics using in vitro tools is an important task during drug development. Albeit, currently used in vitro systems for clearance extrapolation such as microsomes and primary human hepatocytes in suspension culture show reproducible turnover, the utility of these systems is limited by a rapid decline of activity of drug metabolizing enzymes. In this study, a multi-well array culture of primary human hepatocyte spheroids was compared to suspension and single spheroid cultures from the same donor. Multi-well spheroids remained viable and functional over the incubation time of 3 days, showing physiological excretion of albumin and α-AGP. Their metabolic activity was similar compared to suspension and single spheroid cultures. This physiological activity, the high cell concentration, and the prolonged incubation time resulted in significant turnover of all tested low clearance compounds (n = 8). In stark contrast, only one or none of the compounds showed significant turnover when single spheroid or suspension cultures were used. Using multi-well spheroids and a regression offset approach (log(CL int ) = 1.1 × + 0.85), clearance was predicted within 3-fold for 93% (13/14) of the tested compounds. Thus, multi-well spheroids represent a novel and valuable addition to the ADME in vitro tool kit for the determination of low clearance and overall clearance prediction. Graphical Abstract.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
High cell densities in the MPS enable its use for the analysis of low-clearance drugs, which cannot be measured in conventional spheroid cultures.
“Furthermore, high cell densities in the MPS enable its use for the analysis of low-clearance drugs, which cannot be measured in conventional spheroid cultures [48] .”
From 3D microperfusion of mesoscale human microphysiological liver models improves functionality and recapitulates hepatic zonation (2023) · cites this paper as [48]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wesseler, M. F., Taebnia, N., Harrison, S., Youhanna, S., Preiss, L. C., Kemas, A. M., Vegvari, A., Mokry, J., Sullivan, G. J., Lauschke, V. M., et al. (2023) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2023.09.022 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Self-citationLochman, L., Kahiya, E. T., Saade, B., Smutný, T., Tebbens, J. D., Pávek, P., & Bernhauerová, V. (2025) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012886 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Preiss, L. C., Lauschke, V. M., Georgi, K., & Petersson, C.
- Venue
- The AAPS Journal
- Published
- 2022-03
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 1550-7416
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review