Cited by 3Complex Systems and Time Series AnalysisStatistical Mechanics and EntropyPublic Procurement and Policy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Exponential and power laws in public procurement markets

Open access
Kristoufek, Ladislav, Skuhrovec, Jiri·2012·EPL (Europhysics Letters)

Abstract

We analyze for the first time a unique public procurement database, which includes information about a number of bidders for a contract, a final price, an identification of a winner and an identification of a contracting authority for each of more than 40000 public procurements in the Czech Republic between 2006 and 2011, focusing on the distributional properties of the variables of interest. We uncover several scaling laws —the exponential law for the number of bidders, and the power laws for the total revenues and total spendings of the participating companies, which even follows Zipf's law for the 100 most spending institutions. We propose an analogy between extensive and non-extensive systems in physics and the public procurement market situations. Through an entropy maximization, such analogy yields some interesting results and policy implications with respect to the Maxwell-Boltzmann and Pareto distributions in the analyzed quantities.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1209/0295-5075/99/28005

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Pareto V., 1896, Cours d'économie politique professéà l'université de Lausanne
  2. Adamic L., 2002, Glottometrics, 3, 143
  3. Farmer J. D., 2008, Annu. Rev. Econ., 1, 1
  4. Gabaix X., 2008, NBER Work. Pap. Ser., 14299, 1
  5. Lux T., 2008, Kiel Work. Pap., 1425, 1
  6. Havrda J., 1967, Kybernetika, 3, 30

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 3

Metadata

Authors
Kristoufek, L., & Skuhrovec, J.
Affiliations
Charles University (CZ)
Venue
EPL (Europhysics Letters)
Published
2012-07-01
Volume
99
Issue
2
Pages
28005
ISSN
  • 0295-5075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1286-4854
OpenAlex
W2008866429
Cited by
3
References
26
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Europhysics Letters (EPL) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • ASEP (submittedVersion, public-domain)
Funders
  • Univerzita Karlova v Praze
  • Grantová Agentura České Republiky (GA402/09/0965, GAP402/11/0948)
  • Technologická Agentura České Republiky
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Statistical Mechanics and Entropy
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Public Procurement and Policy
Keywords
public procurement, scaling laws, exponential law, power law, Zipf's law, number of bidders, contracting authorities, firm revenue, Pareto distribution, Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution, entropy maximization, procurement policy, Czech Republic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review